@inbook{56448,
  author       = {{Gabriel, Lena and Teubert, Hilke}},
  booktitle    = {{Sport für den Menschen - sozial verantwortliche Interventionen im Raum}},
  editor       = {{Balz, Eckart and Bindel, Tim}},
  pages        = {{129--134}},
  title        = {{{Sportangebote für Flüchtlinge in Sporthallen-Notunterkünften}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@phdthesis{56943,
  author       = {{Witte, Carina}},
  title        = {{{Geschenkekäufe als Instrument des Kundenbeziehungsmarketings}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{45729,
  author       = {{Eggert, Andreas and Steinhoff, Lena and Witte, Carina}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Marketing}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{115--132}},
  title        = {{{Gift Purchases as Catalysts for Strengthening Customer–Brand Relationships}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/0022242919860802}},
  volume       = {{83}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{52240,
  abstract     = {{This study aims to investigate the linguistic differences between an argumentation referring to a potential future action (prospective argumentation) and one justifying a past action (retrospective argumentation) in the parliamentary arena. It is based on the analysis of German and French speeches taken from the protocols of the plenary sessions of the European Parliament.&#x0D;
In a plenary session, parliamentary votes are preceded by a general debate. During this debate, speakers may give reasons supporting their own choice in an upcoming vote, but they may also try to persuade other Members of Parliament to vote the same way. This argumentation is prospective. After the vote, Members may give an oral or written explanation of vote designed to justify their decision. The argumentative orientation in this case is retrospective. In an exemplary approach, 50 speeches per language (German/French) and communication situation (prospective/retrospective) will be analyzed. The study argues that the macrostructure of the speeches is influenced by the orientation of the conclusion: In a prospective argumentation, speakers tend to first present their arguments before coming up with their conclusion, the conclusion being a declaration of one’s own intent to vote or a recommendation for other Members of Parliament. In a prototypical explanation of vote, the conclusion precedes the arguments. Special attention is given to the analysis of argument and conclusion markers. The study tries to show that conclusion markers are relatively more frequent in prospective argumentation, while retrospective argumentation makes broader use of argument markers.}},
  author       = {{Kunert, Irene Dorothea}},
  issn         = {{1615-3014}},
  journal      = {{Linguistik Online}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{49--69}},
  publisher    = {{University of Bern}},
  title        = {{{Prospektives versus retrospektives Argumentieren. Redebeiträge vor und nach einer parlamentarischen Abstimmung}}},
  doi          = {{10.13092/lo.97.5595}},
  volume       = {{97}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{56246,
  author       = {{Biehler, Rolf}},
  booktitle    = {{Calculus in upper secondary and beginning university mathematics—Conference proceedings}},
  editor       = {{Monaghan, J. and Nardi, E. and Dreyfus, T.}},
  pages        = {{4–17}},
  publisher    = {{MatRIC}},
  title        = {{{The transition from calculus and to analysis—Conceptual analyses and supporting steps for students}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{58190,
  author       = {{Seguin, Beranger Fabrice}},
  title        = {{{Les Déformations des Représentations Galoisiennes}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@book{58284,
  editor       = {{Woppowa, Jan}},
  title        = {{{Praxissemester (Religion) in NRW: Bilanz und Perspektiven}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{31504,
  author       = {{Elit, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{Arbitrium 37, H. 2}},
  pages        = {{262--265}},
  title        = {{{[Rezension zu:] Michael Ostheimer: Leseland. Chronotopographie der DDR- und Post-DDR-Literatur, Göttingen 2018}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{24918,
  author       = {{Elit, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{Arbitrium}},
  issn         = {{1865-8849}},
  pages        = {{262--265}},
  title        = {{{[Rezension zu:] Michael Ostheimer, Leseland. Chronotopographie der DDR- und Post-DDRLiteratur. Wallstein, Göttingen 2018. 486 S., € 39,90.}}},
  doi          = {{10.1515/arb-2019-0017}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{57294,
  author       = {{Bergmann, Claudia Dorit}},
  booktitle    = {{Encyclopedia of Jewish-Christian Relations (EJCR)}},
  editor       = {{Homolka, Walter and Kampling, R. and Levine, A.-J.}},
  publisher    = {{De Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Birth}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{28428,
  author       = {{Homt, Martina}},
  title        = {{{Die Nutzenerwartung gegenüber Forschendem Lernen in Praxissemester und Beruf – Einstellungsveränderungen Lehramtsstudierender im Verlauf des Praxissemesters}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{28422,
  author       = {{Homt, Martina and van Ophuysen, Stefanie}},
  journal      = {{Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{177--191}},
  title        = {{{Forschendes Lernen in Praxissemester und Beruf – Einstellungen und Handlungsintention von Lehramtsstudierenden}}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{28427,
  author       = {{Homt, Martina and van Ophuysen, Stefanie}},
  title        = {{{Forschend Lernen in Praxissemester und LehrerInnenberuf – Einstellungen und Handlungsintention von Lehramtsstudierenden}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{28426,
  author       = {{Homt, Martina and van Ophuysen, Stefanie}},
  title        = {{{Die Vorstellungen Lehramtsstudierender von Forschendem Lernen im Verlauf des Praxissemesters}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{58507,
  author       = {{Gutsche, Gunnar and Ziegler, Andreas}},
  issn         = {{0378-4266}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Banking &amp; Finance}},
  pages        = {{193--214}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Which private investors are willing to pay for sustainable investments? Empirical evidence from stated choice experiments}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.03.007}},
  volume       = {{102}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{55494,
  author       = {{Büter, Mara Samira and Weitekamp, Saskia }},
  booktitle    = {{Früher Bildungsdialog - Wissenschaftskommunikation zwischen Bildungsforschung und Schule}},
  editor       = {{Mattiesson, Christiane }},
  pages        = {{89--111}},
  publisher    = {{Klinkhardt}},
  title        = {{{Interdisziplinärer Unterricht am Beispiel des Wassermangels in der spanischen Region Andalusien – Anregungen zur Umsetzung einer Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{59333,
  author       = {{Woppowa, Jan}},
  booktitle    = {{Religion unterrichten in Vielfalt. konfessionell - religiös - weltanschaulich. Ein Handbuch}},
  editor       = {{Eisenhardt, Saskia and Kürzinger, Kathrin S and Naurath, Elisabeth  and Pohl-Patalong, Uta}},
  pages        = {{87--101}},
  title        = {{{Religionsunterricht mit Schüler*innen unterschiedlicher Konfessionen}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{59332,
  author       = {{Woppowa, Jan}},
  journal      = {{forum erwachsenenbildung,}},
  pages        = {{28--31}},
  title        = {{{Ökumenische Bildungsverantwortung. Zum Auftrag religiöser Erwachsenenbildung angesichts aktueller gesellschaftlicher Transformationen}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{59330,
  author       = {{Woppowa, Jan and Caruso, Carina}},
  booktitle    = {{Praxissemester (Religion) in NRW: Bilanz und Perspektiven}},
  editor       = {{Woppowa, Jan and Caruso, Carina}},
  pages        = {{173--188}},
  title        = {{{Das Praxissemester als Bildungsprozess. Plädoyer für eine Weitung des Blickfelds}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{59331,
  author       = {{Woppowa, Jan}},
  booktitle    = {{Studium trifft Beruf – Praxisphasen und Praxisbezüge aus Sicht einer angewandten Theologie}},
  editor       = {{ Feeser-Lichterfeld, Ulrich and Sander,  Kai G}},
  pages        = {{187--201}},
  title        = {{{Spirituelle Kompetenzentwicklung in Praxisphasen: (wie) geht das?}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

