@techreport{27110,
  author       = {{Gausemeier, Jürgen and Guggemos, Michael and Kreimeyer, Andreas and Lange, Thomas and Behrens, Jan Henning and Seitz, Ralph and Ortloff, Luise and Frey, Anna and Dachsberger, Stephanie and Drewel, Marvin and Frank, Maximilian}},
  title        = {{{Nationales Kompetenz-Monitoring - Bericht: Energiespeichersysteme (Fokus Lithium-Ionen-Speicher)}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27379,
  author       = {{Schlegel-Matthies, Kirsten}},
  booktitle    = {{Verbraucherbildung: Ein weiter Weg zum mündigen Verbraucher }},
  editor       = {{Bala, Christian and Buddensiek, Marit and Maier, Petra and Schuldzinski, Wolfgang}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-86336-924-8 }},
  pages        = {{41--60}},
  publisher    = {{Kompetenzzentrum Verbraucherforschung NRW, Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen e.V.}},
  title        = {{{Verbraucherbildung als Bildung für Lebensführung}}},
  doi          = {{10.15501/978-3-86336-924-8_3}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{27380,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Der Beitrag geht der Frage nach, wie haushaltsbezogene Bildung als Ernährungs- und Verbraucherbildung umgesetzt werden kann, damit Jugendliche selbstbestimmt und verantwortlich ihre individuellen Vorstellungen von einem „guten“ und „gelingenden“ Leben umsetzen können. Die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Zusammenwirken von gesellschaftlicher Lebensweise, privater Lebensführung und individuellen Lebensstilen erweist sich dabei als bedeutsam.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Schlegel-Matthies, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2196-1662}},
  journal      = {{Haushalt in Bildung & Forschung}},
  pages        = {{88--106}},
  title        = {{{Haushaltsbezogene Bildung – quo vadis? Daseinsvorsorge und Lebensführung im Wandel}}},
  doi          = {{10.3224/hibifo.v8i2.07}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@phdthesis{27648,
  author       = {{Pohl, Max}},
  title        = {{{High-Speed-Extrusion amorpher Polymere am Beispiel von Polycarbonat (PC) und Polymethylmethacrylat (PMMA)}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@phdthesis{27649,
  author       = {{Meilwes , Peter}},
  title        = {{{Simulation und Modellierung des Druckverlustes industrieller Polymerschmelzefilter in Abhängigkeit verschiedener Prozessbedingungen sowie deren verschmutzung }}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@phdthesis{27653,
  author       = {{Landgräber, Björn}},
  title        = {{{Experimentelle und modellbasierte Analyse der Prozessphasen des Spritzgießsonderverfahrens GITBlow }}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@phdthesis{27654,
  author       = {{Fiebig, Isabel}},
  title        = {{{Beitrag zur Erhöhung der Wirksamkeit der Faserverstärkung in der Schweißnaht faserverstärkter Thermoplaste }}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@phdthesis{27655,
  author       = {{Nordmeyer, Timo }},
  title        = {{{Verfahrenstechnische Entwicklung des Direktinjektion-Plasmaverfahrens im Spritzgießprozess }}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{27758,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Published meta-analyses indicate significant but inconsistent incident type-2 diabetes (T2D)-dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) risk ratios or risk relations (RR). It is now over a decade ago that a published meta-analysis used a predefined standard to identify valid studies. Considering valid studies only, and using random effects dose–response meta-analysis (DRM) while withdrawing spurious results (p &lt; 0.05), we ascertained whether these relations would support nutrition guidance, specifically for an RR &gt; 1.20 with a lower 95% confidence limit &gt;1.10 across typical intakes (approximately 10th to 90th percentiles of population intakes). The combined T2D–GI RR was 1.27 (1.15–1.40) (p &lt; 0.001, n = 10 studies) per 10 units GI, while that for the T2D–GL RR was 1.26 (1.15–1.37) (p &lt; 0.001, n = 15) per 80 g/d GL in a 2000 kcal (8400 kJ) diet. The corresponding global DRM using restricted cubic splines were 1.87 (1.56–2.25) (p &lt; 0.001, n = 10) and 1.89 (1.66–2.16) (p &lt; 0.001, n = 15) from 47.6 to 76.1 units GI and 73 to 257 g/d GL in a 2000 kcal diet, respectively. In conclusion, among adults initially in good health, diets higher in GI or GL were robustly associated with incident T2D. Together with mechanistic and other data, this supports that consideration should be given to these dietary risk factors in nutrition advice. Concerning the public health relevance at the global level, our evidence indicates that GI and GL are substantial food markers predicting the development of T2D worldwide, for persons of European ancestry and of East Asian ancestry.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Livesey, Geoffrey and Taylor, Richard and Livesey, Helen F. and Buyken, Anette and Jenkins, David J. A. and Augustin, Livia S. A. and Sievenpiper, John L. and Barclay, Alan W. and Liu, Simin and Wolever, Thomas M. S. and Willett, Walter C. and Brighenti, Furio and Salas-Salvadó, Jordi and Björck, Inger and Rizkalla, Salwa W. and Riccardi, Gabriele and Vecchia, Carlo La and Ceriello, Antonio and Trichopoulou, Antonia and Poli, Andrea and Astrup, Arne and Kendall, Cyril W. C. and Ha, Marie-Ann and Baer-Sinnott, Sara and Brand-Miller, Jennie C.}},
  issn         = {{2072-6643}},
  journal      = {{Nutrients}},
  title        = {{{Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/nu11061280}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{27759,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>While dietary factors are important modifiable risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2D), the causal role of carbohydrate quality in nutrition remains controversial. Dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been examined in relation to the risk of T2D in multiple prospective cohort studies. Previous meta-analyses indicate significant relations but consideration of causality has been minimal. Here, the results of our recent meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies of 4 to 26-y follow-up are interpreted in the context of the nine Bradford-Hill criteria for causality, that is: (1) Strength of Association, (2) Consistency, (3) Specificity, (4) Temporality, (5) Biological Gradient, (6) Plausibility, (7) Experimental evidence, (8) Analogy, and (9) Coherence. These criteria necessitated referral to a body of literature wider than prospective cohort studies alone, especially in criteria 6 to 9. In this analysis, all nine of the Hill’s criteria were met for GI and GL indicating that we can be confident of a role for GI and GL as causal factors contributing to incident T2D. In addition, neither dietary fiber nor cereal fiber nor wholegrain were found to be reliable or effective surrogate measures of GI or GL. Finally, our cost–benefit analysis suggests food and nutrition advice favors lower GI or GL and would produce significant potential cost savings in national healthcare budgets. The high confidence in causal associations for incident T2D is sufficient to consider inclusion of GI and GL in food and nutrient-based recommendations.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Livesey, Geoffrey and Taylor, Richard and Livesey, Helen F. and Buyken, Anette and Jenkins, David J. A. and Augustin, Livia S. A. and Sievenpiper, John L. and Barclay, Alan W. and Liu, Simin and Wolever, Thomas M. S. and Willett, Walter C. and Brighenti, Furio and Salas-Salvadó, Jordi and Björck, Inger and Rizkalla, Salwa W. and Riccardi, Gabriele and Vecchia, Carlo La and Ceriello, Antonio and Trichopoulou, Antonia and Poli, Andrea and Astrup, Arne and Kendall, Cyril W. C. and Ha, Marie-Ann and Baer-Sinnott, Sara and Brand-Miller, Jennie C.}},
  issn         = {{2072-6643}},
  journal      = {{Nutrients}},
  title        = {{{Dietary Glycemic Index and Load and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Assessment of Causal Relations}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/nu11061436}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{27772,
  author       = {{Oluwagbemigun, Kolade and Buyken, Anette and Alexy, Ute and Schmid, Matthias and Herder, Christian and Nöthlings, Ute}},
  issn         = {{1475-2840}},
  journal      = {{Cardiovascular Diabetology}},
  title        = {{{Developmental trajectories of body mass index from childhood into late adolescence and subsequent late adolescence–young adulthood cardiometabolic risk markers}}},
  doi          = {{10.1186/s12933-019-0813-5}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27816,
  author       = {{Eickelmann, Birgit and Drossel, Kerstin}},
  booktitle    = {{Jahrbuch Ganztagsschule 2019/20}},
  editor       = {{Maschke, Sabine and Schulz-Gade, Gunild and Stecher, Ludwig}},
  pages        = {{139--150}},
  publisher    = {{Debus Pädagogik Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Chancen des digitalen Lernens in der Ganztagsschule}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27817,
  author       = {{Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit}},
  booktitle    = {{Individuelle Förderung im Unterricht. Empirische Befunde und Hinweise für die Praxis}},
  editor       = {{Knauder, Hannelore and Reisinger, Christa-Monika}},
  pages        = {{143--156}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Potenziale der Tabletnutzung im Unterricht zur individuellen Förderung – Analysen und Forschungsperspektiven}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27818,
  author       = {{Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit}},
  booktitle    = {{Lehrer. Bildung. Gestalten. Beiträge zur empirischen Forschung in der Lehrerbildung}},
  editor       = {{Ehmke, Timo and Kuhl, Poldi and Pietsch, Marcus}},
  publisher    = {{Beltz-Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Die Implementation digitaler Medien gestalten: zur Bedeutung der Einstellungen von Fremdsprachenlehrkräften}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27820,
  author       = {{Senkbeil, Martin and Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit and Vennemann, Mario}},
  booktitle    = {{ICILS 2018 #Deutschland – Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking}},
  editor       = {{Eickelmann, Birgit and Bos, Wilfried and Gerick, Julia and Goldhammer, Frank and Schaumburg, Heike and Schwippert, Knut and Senkbeil, Martin and Vahrenhold, Jan}},
  pages        = {{301--333}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Soziale Herkunft und computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich}}},
  doi          = {{10.25656/01:18328}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27821,
  author       = {{Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit and Schaumburg, Heike and Labusch, Amelie}},
  booktitle    = {{ICILS 2018 #Deutschland – Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking}},
  editor       = {{Eickelmann, Birgit and Bos, Wilfried and Gerick, Julia and Goldhammer, Frank and Schaumburg, Heike and Schwippert, Knut and Senkbeil, Martin and Vahrenhold, Jan}},
  pages        = {{205--240}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Nutzung digitaler Medien und Prädiktoren aus der Perspektive der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer im internationalen Vergleich}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27822,
  author       = {{Eickelmann, Birgit and Drossel, Kerstin}},
  booktitle    = {{Schulreform – Zugänge, Gegenstände, Trends}},
  editor       = {{Berkemeyer, Nils and Bos, Wilfried and Hermstein, Björn}},
  pages        = {{445--458}},
  publisher    = {{Münster}},
  title        = {{{Digitalisierung im deutschen Bildungssystem im Kontext des Schulreformdiskurses}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27823,
  author       = {{Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit and Port, Sonja and Lorenz, Ramona}},
  booktitle    = {{Transfer zwischen Lehrer(fort)bildung und Wissenschaft}},
  editor       = {{Manitius, Veronika and van Holt, Nils}},
  pages        = {{107--128}},
  publisher    = {{wbv media}},
  title        = {{{Berufliche, pädagogische und didaktische Professionalisierungsmaßnahmen in der Sekundarstufe im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung und der Zusammenhang mit der Förderung digitaler Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{27824,
  author       = {{Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit and Vennemann, Mario}},
  issn         = {{0012-0731}},
  journal      = {{DDS – Die Deutsche Schule}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{391--404}},
  title        = {{{Digitalisierung und Bildungsgerechtigkeit – die schulische Perspektive}}},
  doi          = {{10.31244/dds.2019.04.03}},
  volume       = {{111}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{27825,
  author       = {{Eickelmann, Birgit and Drossel, Kerstin and Port, Sonja}},
  booktitle    = {{Nachhaltige Professionalisierung für Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Ideen, Entwicklungen, Konzepte}},
  editor       = {{Groot-Wilken, Bernd and Koerber, Rolf}},
  pages        = {{57--82}},
  publisher    = {{wbv media}},
  title        = {{{Was bedeutet die Digitalisierung für die Lehrerfortbildung? – Ausgangslage und Perspektiven}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

