@inbook{50923,
  author       = {{Blank, Andreas}},
  booktitle    = {{Vegetative Powers. The Roots of Life in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Natural Philosophy. }},
  editor       = {{Baldassarri, Fabrizio and Blank, Andreas}},
  pages        = {{199--219}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{“Nicolaus Taurellus on Vegetative Powers and the Question of Substance Monism.” }}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51004,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>For Émilie Du Châtelet, I argue, a central role of the principle of sufficient reason is to discriminate between better and worse explanations. Her principle of sufficient reason does not play this role for just any conceivable intellect: it specifically enables understanding for minds like ours. She develops this idea in terms of two criteria for the success of our explanations: “understanding how” and “understanding why.” These criteria can respectively be connected to the <jats:italic>determinateness</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>contrastivity</jats:italic> of explanations. The crucial role Du Châtelet’s principle of sufficient reason plays in identifying good explanations is often overlooked in the literature, or else run together with questions about the justification and likelihood of explanations. An auxiliary goal of the article is to situate Du Châtelet’s principle of sufficient reason with respect to some of the general epistemological and metaphysical commitments of her <jats:italic>Institutions de Physique</jats:italic>, clarifying how it fits into the broader project of that work.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wells, Aaron}},
  issn         = {{0038-4283}},
  journal      = {{The Southern Journal of Philosophy}},
  keywords     = {{Philosophy}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{629--655}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Du Châtelet on Sufficient Reason and Empirical Explanation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/sjp.12433}},
  volume       = {{59}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51003,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>There is a tension in Emilie Du Châtelet’s thought on mathematics. The objects of mathematics are ideal or fictional entities; nevertheless, mathematics is presented as indispensable for an account of the physical world. After outlining Du Châtelet’s position, and showing how she departs from Christian Wolff’s pessimism about Newtonian mathematical physics, I show that the tension in her position is only apparent. Du Châtelet has a worked-out defense of the explanatory and epistemic need for mathematical objects, consistent with their metaphysical nonfundamentality. I conclude by sketching how Du Châtelet’s conception of mathematical indispensability differs interestingly from many contemporary approaches.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wells, Aaron}},
  issn         = {{0031-8248}},
  journal      = {{Philosophy of Science}},
  keywords     = {{History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, History}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{1137--1148}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{Du Châtelet on the Need for Mathematics in Physics}}},
  doi          = {{10.1086/714874}},
  volume       = {{88}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51002,
  author       = {{Wells, Aaron}},
  issn         = {{2168-9105}},
  journal      = {{Res Philosophica}},
  keywords     = {{Philosophy}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{469--497}},
  publisher    = {{Philosophy Documentation Center}},
  title        = {{{The Priority of Natural Laws in Kant's Early Philosophy}}},
  doi          = {{10.11612/resphil.2029}},
  volume       = {{98}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51013,
  author       = {{Wells, Aaron}},
  issn         = {{0031-8094}},
  journal      = {{The Philosophical Quarterly}},
  keywords     = {{Philosophy}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{791--793}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press (OUP)}},
  title        = {{{The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant's Dialectic}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/pq/pqab044}},
  volume       = {{72}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51044,
  abstract     = {{L’objectif de cette étude est d’analyser, à partir de la conception des vices, de l’ignorance et de la curiosité, les pensées de Montaigne et de Descartes, afin de découvrir s’il y a filiation, héritage ou même réception de la conception montaignienne dans celle cartésienne. Chez Descartes, l’ignorance produit le vice et la science crée la vertu, mais, pour Montaigne, cette distinction n’est pas si simple : la vertu et le vice se conçoivent à l’intérieur même de l’action et de la vie de l’homme.}},
  author       = {{Muller, Jil}},
  journal      = {{Bulletin de la Société internationale des amis de Montaigne}},
  pages        = {{285--304}},
  publisher    = {{Classiques Garnier}},
  title        = {{{Les « fleaux de nostre ame », Les vices dans la pensée de Montaigne et de Descartes}}},
  doi          = {{10.48611/ISBN.978-2-406-12607-2.P.0285}},
  volume       = {{73}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{37817,
  author       = {{Taschl-Erber, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{Die Datierung neutestamentlicher Pseudepigraphen. Herausforderungen und neuere Lösungsansätze}},
  editor       = {{Grünstäudl, Wolfgang and Schmidt, Mathias}},
  title        = {{{Zwischen Römer- und Epheserbrief. Zur Kontextualisierung des Kolosserbriefs}}},
  volume       = {{470}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{37818,
  author       = {{Taschl-Erber, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{Perspektiven zur Präexistenz im Frühjudentum und im frühen Christentum}},
  editor       = {{Frey, Jörg and Schröter, Jens and Kunath, Friederike }},
  title        = {{{Im Anfang und als Anfang erschaffen. Zur „Präexistenz“ der Weisheit in Spr 8,22–31}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{37816,
  author       = {{Taschl-Erber, Andrea and Lumesberger-Loisl, Barbara }},
  booktitle    = {{Wort-Schatz Bibel}},
  editor       = {{Pichler, Josef }},
  title        = {{{Redeverbot für Frauen bei Paulus? Die Macht der Rezeption}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{50863,
  author       = {{Blank, Andreas}},
  journal      = {{History of European Ideas}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1228--1242}},
  title        = {{{“The Morality of the Desire for Esteem: Gassendi and the Augustinian Challenge.” }}},
  volume       = {{47}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{50864,
  author       = {{Blank, Andreas}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Philosophy}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{475--486}},
  title        = {{{“Wolff on Duties of Esteem in the Law of Peoples.” }}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{51141,
  author       = {{ Saul, Nicholas}},
  booktitle    = {{Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik}},
  editor       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto and Donahue, William Collins and Helfer, Martha B. and Kramer, Sven}},
  pages        = {{284}},
  publisher    = {{Brill, Rodopi}},
  title        = {{{Interrogations of Evolutionism in German Literature 1859-2011}}},
  volume       = {{Bd. 93}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{51144,
  author       = {{Dunker, Axel and  Gerstner , Jan   and Osthues, Julian  }},
  booktitle    = {{Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik}},
  editor       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto }},
  pages        = {{277}},
  publisher    = {{Brill, Rodopi}},
  title        = {{{“Migrationsvordergrund” – “Provinzhintergrund”. Deutschsprachige Literatur osteuropäischer Herkunft}}},
  volume       = {{Bd. 94}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{49870,
  author       = {{Graßl, Benjamin and Giese, Henning}},
  journal      = {{beck.digitax}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{13--21}},
  title        = {{{Überwälzung von Digitalsteuern}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{48555,
  author       = {{Hartung, Olaf and Meyer-Hamme, Johannes and Krebs, Alexandra and Fastlabend-Vargas, Daniel}},
  booktitle    = {{Geschichtsdidaktische Hochschullehre. Strukturen – Konzepte – Methoden}},
  editor       = {{Sauer, Michael and Runge, Friederike}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7344-1338-4}},
  pages        = {{51--66}},
  publisher    = {{Wochenschau Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Theorie – Empirie – Reflexivität. Das Paderborner Modell geschichtsdidaktischer Betreuung schulischer Langzeitpraktika von Lehramtsstudierenden im Fach Geschichte}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{41143,
  author       = {{Meyer-Hamme, Johannes}},
  booktitle    = {{Schüler und Schülerinnen denken Geschichte. Subjektorientierung im Geschichtsunterricht und in der Politischen Bildung}},
  editor       = {{Hellmuth, Thomas and Preisinger, Alexander and Ottner-Diesenberger, Christine}},
  pages        = {{14–26}},
  title        = {{{„‚...und wie heißt der Mann auf Kaiser Wilhelm?‘ Oder: Zur Bedeutung der Subjektorientierung für das historische Lernen.“ }}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@techreport{22923,
  author       = {{Fochmann, Martin and Heile, Vanessa and Huber, Hans-Peter and Maiterth, Ralf and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
  title        = {{{Umfrage: Steuerliche Belastung deutscher Unternehmen – Steuerlast und Verwaltungskosten}}},
  doi          = {{10.52569/xgkv7897}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{51170,
  author       = {{Schreckenberg, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{Figuraciones literarias del poder político en el Siglo de Oro}},
  editor       = {{Friedrich, Sabine and Wehr, Christian}},
  pages        = {{157--176}},
  title        = {{{Del rey abajo ninguno. Representaciones y problematizaciones del poder político en el teatro barroco}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{51172,
  author       = {{Schreckenberg, Stefan}},
  journal      = {{Hispanorama}},
  pages        = {{27--33}},
  title        = {{{Del texto a las emociones vivas: ¡Perderle el miedo al teatro del Siglo de Oro!}}},
  volume       = {{173}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{41145,
  author       = {{Meyer-Hamme, Johannes and Krebs, Alexandra}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Geschichtsdidaktik}},
  pages        = {{180--196}},
  title        = {{{Historisches Lernen digital. Die neue Version der App in die Geschichte}}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}