@inproceedings{18369,
abstract = {Visualising is a method used to help experiencing and understanding causal cohesions in simulation processes. For this purpose, tools for visualising are already implemented in prevalent simulation systems. The user creates his simulation model and generates a 3-dimensional (2,5-dimensional) visualising by means of the simulation system. This helps examining the process which makes it easier for the viewer to understand it. Simulation tools usually only provide the opportunity for a unidirectional visualising. In a 3-dimensional surrounding the viewer can not implement an interaction with the simulation while the system is running. Though an interaction during the simulation run enables the user to gain a better understanding of causal cohesions. Solutions via HLA are sophisticated and therefore rather suited for extensive projects.
We present a distributed system consisting of a commercial manufacturing simulation tool, a coupling module and a walkthrough system. The distributed system in conjunctions with the coupling module guarantees generality and a wide field of applications of the walkthrough system. Further it guarantees flexibility and selection of the specialized graphics hardware for the walkthrough system. A further contribution of this paper is the solution of the time synchronisation problem caused by simulation tool and walkthrough system.
},
author = {Mueck, Bengt and Dangelmaier, Wilhelm and Fischer, Matthias and Klemisch, Wolfram},
booktitle = {Simulation und Visualisierung},
pages = {71--84},
publisher = {SCS European Publishing House},
title = {{Bi-directional Coupling of Simulation Tools with a Walkthrough-System}},
year = {2002},
}
@misc{18408,
author = {Peckhaus, Volker},
booktitle = {Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete [Zbl. 0987.00002]},
title = {{Waldegg, Guillermina, “Ontological Convictions and Epistemological Obstacles in Bolzano’s Geometry”, Science and Education 10 (2001), 409–418}},
year = {2002},
}
@misc{18403,
author = {Peckhaus, Volker},
booktitle = {Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete [Zbl. 0981.03004]},
title = {{Linsky, Bernard, Russell’s Metaphysical Logic, CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA 1999}},
year = {2002},
}
@misc{18410,
author = {Peckhaus, Volker},
booktitle = {Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete [Zbl. 0990.03002]},
title = {{Moore, Gregory H., “The Prehistory of Infinitary Logic: 1885–1955”, in: Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara u.a. (Hgg.), Structures and Norms in Science. Volume two of the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Florence, Italy, August 1995, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997, 105–123}},
year = {2002},
}
@misc{18415,
author = {Peckhaus, Volker},
booktitle = {Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete [Zbl. 0993.01003, Reprint von MR 2002h:01005]},
title = {{Degnan, Michael J., “What is the Scope of Aristotle’s Defense of the PNC”, Apeiron 32 (1999), no. 3, 243–274}},
year = {2002},
}
@inbook{18287,
author = {Tophinke, Doris},
booktitle = {Sprache als Form. FS für Utz Maas},
editor = {Bommes, Michael and Noack, Christina and Tophinke, Doris},
pages = {169--181},
publisher = {Westdeutscher Verlag},
title = {{Schreiben gegen die Regel – Formen und Funktionen orthografischer Abweichungen im Internet Relay Chat (IRC)}},
year = {2002},
}
@inbook{18321,
author = {Tophinke, Doris},
booktitle = {Textsorten im romanischen Sprachvergleich},
editor = {Drescher, Martina},
pages = {267--271},
publisher = {Stauffenburg},
title = {{Texttypologie aus diachroner Sicht}},
year = {2002},
}
@inproceedings{18566,
abstract = {We analyze a randomized pursuit-evasion game on graphs. This game is played by two players, a hunter and a rabbit. Let G be any connected, undirected graph with n nodes. The game is played in rounds and in each round both the hunter and the rabbit are located at a node of the graph. Between rounds both the hunter and the rabbit can stay at the current node or move to another node. The hunter is assumed to be restricted to the graph G: in every round, the hunter can move using at most one edge. For the rabbit we investigate two models: in one model the rabbit is restricted to the same graph as the hunter, and in the other model the rabbit is unrestricted, i.e., it can jump to an arbitrary node in every round.
We say that the rabbit is caught as soon as hunter and rabbit are located at the same node in a round. The goal of the hunter is to catch the rabbit in as few rounds as possible, whereas the rabbit aims to maximize the number of rounds until it is caught. Given a randomized hunter strategy for G, the escape length for that strategy is the worst case expected number of rounds it takes the hunter to catch the rabbit, where the worst case is with regards to all (possibly randomized) rabbit strategies. Our main result is a hunter strategy for general graphs with an escape length of only O
(n log (diam(G))) against restricted as well as unrestricted rabbits. This bound is close to optimal since Ω(n) is a trivial lower bound on the escape length in both models. Furthermore, we prove that our upper bound is optimal up to constant factors against unrestricted rabbits.},
author = {Adler, Micah and Räcke, Harald and Sivadasan, Naveen and Sohler, Christian and Vöcking, Berthold},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming},
isbn = {9783540438649},
issn = {0302-9743},
title = {{Randomized Pursuit-Evasion in Graphs}},
doi = {10.1007/3-540-45465-9_77},
year = {2002},
}
@misc{18756,
author = {Peckhaus, Volker},
booktitle = {Mathematical Reviews [MR 2002h:01005]},
title = {{Degnan, Michael J., “What is the Scope of Aristotle’s Defense of the PNC”, Apeiron 32 (1999), no. 3, 243–274}},
year = {2002},
}
@misc{18751,
author = {Peckhaus, Volker},
booktitle = {Mathematical Reviews [MR 2002h:01001]},
title = {{Thom, Paul, “The Principle of Non-contradiction in Early Greek Philosophy”, Apeiron 32 (1999), no. 3, 153–170}},
year = {2002},
}