@inbook{44678, author = {{Eickelmann, Birgit}}, booktitle = {{Remote Schools. Schulisches Distanzlernen in und nach der Corona-Pandemie.}}, pages = {{32--36}}, publisher = {{Deutsches Goethe-Institut Bulgarien }}, title = {{{Digitale Schultransformation ganzheitlich gestalten}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @techreport{44680, author = {{Eickelmann, Birgit}}, title = {{{Lehren aus der Pandemie: Gleiche Chancen für alle Kinder und Jugendlichen sichern. Stellungnahme der Expert*innenkommission der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{24280, abstract = {{Challenges in decisions on technical changes are the lack of knowledge about the expected impact and change propagation. Currently, no literature study contains a systematic differentiation and evaluation of existing approaches, which is a prerequisite for practitioners to select a suitable approach. This research aims at defining differentiation criteria as well as generally applicable requirements for evaluation. A four-step approach is used: systematic literature review on approaches for impact analysis of engineering changes (1), categorization and prioritization of approaches based on reoccuring elements (2), derivation of context specific requirements for evaluation (3), and evaluation of approaches (4). The result indicates existing potential of object-oriented modeling approaches.}}, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Wiechel, Dominik}}, booktitle = {{DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X}}, editor = {{Krause, Dieter and Paetzold, Kristin and Wartzack, Sandro}}, keywords = {{Engineering Change Management, Impact Analysis, Engineering Changes, Model-based Systems Engineering, Product Developmen}}, location = {{Tutzing}}, title = {{{Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen des Engineering Change Managements}}}, doi = {{10.35199/dfx2021.12}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{26866, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Roesmann, Daniel and Wiechel, Dominik and Preuß, Daniel and Pottebaum, Jens}}, booktitle = {{54th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems}}, location = {{Athens}}, title = {{{Determine similarity of assembly operations using semantic technology}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.209 }}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{23392, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Wiechel, Dominik and Pottebaum, Jens}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of 19th Drive Train Technology Conference (ATK 2021), 9. - 11. Mrz. 2021}}, publisher = {{ IOP Publishing}}, title = {{{Role model of model-based systems engineering application}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{44693, author = {{Schreckenberg, Stefan}}, booktitle = {{Esthétique de la guerre - Éthique de la paix. Un siècle de littérature sur la Grande Guerre}}, editor = {{Mecke, Jochen and Schoentjes, Pierre and Donnarieix, Anne-Sophie }}, pages = {{217--232}}, publisher = {{Garnier}}, title = {{{Éthiques et esthétiques de la Grande Guerre chez des auteurs de la génération des petits-enfants}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{24080, abstract = {{Challenges of the development of mechatronic systems and corresponding production systems have increased steadily. Changes are primarily due to increased product complexity and the connection to the internet of things and services, enabling Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS). Major innovations of the revised VDI guideline 2206 for developing mechatronic systems are systems thinking as a core element and six checkpoints for structuring deliverables along the V-Model. These checkpoints serve for orientation in result progress and thus enable a structured and complete development process. However, tasks and checkpoints of the new guideline focus on the product development itself without integrating the development of related CPPS, enabling optimization simultaneously to system development. Implications are derived by a three-step analysis. The paper at hand contributes fundamental extensions of the checkpoint questions regarding integrated CPPS development. These questions provide methodical support for system developers of CPPS for CPS by enabling the project manager to check the status, schedule further development steps and evaluate the maturity of the whole, integrated development.}}, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Wiechel, Dominik and Roesmann, Daniel and Thiele, Henrik}}, booktitle = {{Procedia CIRP}}, issn = {{2212-8271}}, keywords = {{Cyber-Physical Production System (CPPS), V-Model, Product System Development, Integrated Development, VDI 2206}}, pages = {{253--258}}, title = {{{V-model based development of cyber-physical systems and cyber-physical production systems}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.119}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{24281, abstract = {{In order to optimize production processes and to avoid errors, it is not only necessary to automate processes, but also to integrate workers with their individual personality and skill profiles. For this purpose, human factors should be considered in the entire design process. The integrated view of mental human models, the cognitive demand of the working environment and the automation design is essential. Human-System Integration (HSI) constitutes a promising approach. Current model-based approaches offer possibilities to analyze and optimize tasks within an overall system, but they still lack integration. This leads to the research question: How can human factors be integrated into a system model of a socio-technical, Cyber-Physical Production System? The paper at hand contributes an approach of human factor integration into the procedure of Model-Based Systems Engineering for Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS). The approach combines a system model of a CPPS with HSI concepts. In accordance to the benefits of MBSE, SysML is selected to integrate human factors in the development process of a CPPS. The approach is divided into five steps, which includes the extension of the SysML meta model. This allows the optimization of skill-based human-machine interaction. Defined HSI-Profiles enable system developers to integrate employee requirements at early stages within the development process. The approach is demonstrated by the maintenance of a 3D-Printer as a case example. This research enables system developers to depict individual workers with the help of the developed concepts and systematically integrate them into the development process of a CPPS.}}, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Wiechel, Dominik and Roesmann, Daniel}}, booktitle = {{Procedia CIRP}}, issn = {{2212-8271}}, pages = {{518--523}}, title = {{{Integrating human factors in the model based development of cyber-physical production systems}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.113}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{24444, author = {{Hesse, Philipp and Gräßler, Iris}}, booktitle = {{Digitalisierung im Kontext von Nachhaltigkeit und Klimawandel}}, editor = {{Biedermann, Hubert and Posch, Wolfgang and Vorbach, Stefan}}, pages = {{135--148}}, publisher = {{Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft}}, title = {{{Digitaler Zwilling zur Gestaltung der Prozesse im End-of-Life}}}, doi = {{10.5771/9783957102966-135}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2021}}, } @misc{27680, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Hentze, Julian and Hesse, Philipp and Preuß, Daniel and Thiele, Henrik and Wiechel, Dominik and Bothen, Martin and Bruckmann, Tobias and Dattner, Michael and Ehl, Thomas and Hawlas, Martin and Krimpmann, Christoph and Lachmayer, Roland and Knöchelmann, Marvin and Mock, Randolf and Mozgova, Iryna and Schneider, Maximilian and Stollt, Guido}}, pages = {{67}}, publisher = {{Ed.: VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik}}, title = {{{VDI/VDE 2206 - Entwicklung mechatronischer und cyber-physischer Systeme}}}, year = {{2021}}, }