@article{54775,
  author       = {{Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Krämer, Tobias  and Trenz, Manuel and Weiger, Welt}},
  journal      = {{Information Systems Research (VHB Jourqual 3 A+, FT50)}},
  number       = {{2}},
  title        = {{{Deeper down the rabbit hole - How technology conspiracy beliefs emerge and foster a conspiracy mindset}}},
  doi          = {{10.1287/isre.2022.0494}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{56603,
  author       = {{Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Trenz, Manuel and Welf, Weiger}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Information Technology}},
  number       = {{3}},
  title        = {{{Don’t count your chickens before they hatch: Conceptualizing and exploring deviations from polls during public health app releases}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/02683962241295781}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{54576,
  author       = {{Nastjuk, Ilja and Rampold, Florian and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Benitez, Jose}},
  issn         = {{0960-085X}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Information Systems (VHB Jourqual 3 A)}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{1--24}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{A field experiment on ISP training designs for enhancing employee information security compliance}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/0960085x.2024.2359460}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62151,
  author       = {{Keller, Thomas and Warwas, Julia and Klein, Julia and Henkenjohann, Richard and Trenz, Manuel and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam}},
  journal      = {{JMIR Medical Education}},
  number       = {{e73245}},
  title        = {{{ Motivational Framing Strategies in Health Care Information Security Training: Randomized Controlled Trial}}},
  doi          = {{10.2196/73245}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62152,
  author       = {{Schütz, Florian and Ortiz de Guinea Lopez, Ana and Wolf, Tobias and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam}},
  journal      = {{Communications of the Association for Information Systems}},
  title        = {{{Better (Cyber) Insured than Sorry? Unraveling Cognitive Factors in the (Non-)Adoption of Personal Cyber Insurance using fsQCA}}},
  volume       = {{accepted}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62154,
  author       = {{Horsthemke, Johanna and Böhm, Eva}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 2025 AMS 25th World Marketing Congress}},
  title        = {{{Keep Reward Or Return Fee – How Do Incentives In Product Return Management Influence Return Decisions And Future Customer Behavior?}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62160,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Laser powder bed fusion is a cornerstone technology for additive manufacturing (AM) of metals and polymers, yet challenges in achieving consistent reproducibility and process optimization persist. Addressing these requires a systematic understanding of the interactions between feedstock, process parameters, and final part characteristics throughout the entire production chain. This study presents results from a comprehensive interlaboratory investigation conducted by 32 research institutions, evaluating six feedstock, including nanoparticle‐modified aluminum alloy and polyamide powders, under standardized protocols. Data analysis encompasses 69 powder properties, 15 process parameters per print, and 78 part features, culminating in a dataset of over 1.2 million correlations. Advanced statistical methods and machine learning are employed to identify critical variability drivers, such as the impact of nanoparticle modifications on powder flowability and thermal conductivity, as well as the influence of process parameters on reproducibility. Newly introduced dimensionless figures of merit provide universal metrics to describe and predict thermal and mechanical interactions, simplifying process optimization and material characterization. The findings, supported by an open‐access dataset adhering to findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable principles, advance understanding of material–process–structure–property relationships. They establish a benchmark for future research and lay the foundation for improving the reliability, quality, and sustainability of AM processes.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Kuşoğlu, Ihsan Murat and Garg, Sunidhi and Abel, Arvid and Balachandran, Prasanna V. and Barcikowski, Stephan and Becker, Louis and Bernsmann, Jan-Simeon and Boseila, Jonas and Broeckmann, Christoph and Coskun, Mert and Dreyer, Malte and East, Mark and Easton, Mark and Ellendt, Nils and Gann, Stan and Gökce, Bilal and Goßling, Mareen and Greiner, Joachim and Gruber, Piotr and Grünewald, Moritz and Gurung, Kopila and Hantke, Nick and Hengsbach, Florian and Holländer, Hannes and Van Hooreweder, Brecht and Hoyer, Kay-Peter and Huang, Yajiang and Huber, Florian and Kessler, Olaf and Kısasöz, Burçin Özbay and Kleszczynski, Stefan and Koc, Ebubekir and Kurzynowski, Tomasz and Kwade, Arno and Leupold, Simon and Liu, Dongmei and Lomo, Felix and Lüddecke, Arne and Luinstra, Gerrit A. and Mauchline, David A. and Meyer, Fabian and Meyer, Lars and Middendorf, Peter and Nolte, Stefan and Olejarczyk, Michał and Overmeyer, Ludger and Pich, Andrij and Platt, Sebastian and Radtke, Felix and Ramm, Roland and Rittinghaus, Silja-Katharina and Rothfelder, Richard and Rudloff, Johannes and Schaper, Mirko and Scheck, Marie Luise and Schleifenbaum, Johannes Henrich and Schmidt, Michael and Sehrt, Jan T. and Shabanga, Yvonne P. and Sommereyns, Alexander and Steuer, Rabea and Tisha, Layla Shams and Toenjes, Anastasiya and Tuck, Christopher and Vaghar, Adrian and Vrancken, Bey and Wang, Zhengze and Weber, Sebastian and Wegner, Jan and Xu, Bai-Xiang and Yang, Yangyiwei and Zhang, Duyao and Zhuravlev, Evgeny and Ziefuss, Anna R.}},
  issn         = {{1438-1656}},
  journal      = {{Advanced Engineering Materials}},
  number       = {{14}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Large‐Scale Interlaboratory Study Along the Entire Process Chain of Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Bridging Variability, Standards, and Optimization across Metals and Polymers}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/adem.202402930}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61043,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Dynamic market conditions, technological disruption and social change require organizations to continuously adapt and evolve. However, studies on organizational change show that the majority of transformations undertaken fail because they are characterized by a lack of clarity, overload and ineffective measures. This paper shows how a clear structure as a critical success factor can make the chaos and challenges of a transformation manageable.  The focus here is on a practice-oriented framework that divides a transformation into nine essential building blocks with activities that are critical to success. The structure of the framework is understood as a flexible organizing principle for a transformation without hindering creativity and dynamics. Case studies show the adaptability and applicability of the framework to different characteristics and dimensions of transformation. The transformation framework provides an operative structure and enables transformation managers for transparent orchestration and implementation of transformation.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt and Fritzen, Marc}},
  booktitle    = {{AHFE International}},
  issn         = {{2771-0718}},
  location     = {{Pula, Croatia}},
  publisher    = {{AHFE International}},
  title        = {{{The importance of structure in transformation chaos: A Transformation Framework}}},
  doi          = {{10.54941/ahfe1006790}},
  volume       = {{198}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61055,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>ABSTRACT:</jats:title><jats:p>Challenges of increasing system complexity and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration are prompting companies to reorganize towards Systems Engineering (SE). As part of the implementation of large-scale transformation programs, transformation progress is of great interest to management and employees involved. Existing maturity models lack measurable variables and reliable forecast. For this reason, a maturity model for evaluating SE Transformation is developed, that builds on quantitative metrics and enables an overarching view on transformation considering cultural aspects. Literature-based criteria for evaluating SE Transformation lay the foundation for measures and referenced metrics and indicators. Due to its data-centricity, the model presented enables a more comprehensive, fact-based decision-making basis for the design and steering of SE Transformation programs.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Graessler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt and Felgen, Luc}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Design Society}},
  issn         = {{2732-527X}},
  location     = {{Dallas, USA}},
  pages        = {{1081--1090}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{Data-driven decision support in the design and controlling of systems engineering transformation: a maturity model}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/pds.2025.10122}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{60140,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
	  <jats:p>The increasing prevalence of embedded software in today’s vehicles is leading to growing complexity, which can only be managed effectively through the use of reliable interdisciplinary engineering processes. With this in mind, systems engineering (SE) is currently being introduced on a large scale into the automotive industry. Pilot projects have demonstrated the potential for implementing changes, but these have not yet been accompanied by viable implementation concepts for SE. In the context of the proposed application-based research, the SETup automotive method (<jats:bold>S</jats:bold>ystems <jats:bold>E</jats:bold>ngineering <jats:bold>T</jats:bold>ransformation <jats:bold>u</jats:bold>nder <jats:bold>p</jats:bold>iloting in the <jats:bold>automotive</jats:bold> industry) is presented, which comprises a step-by-step procedure of introducing SE into large automotive companies. By introducing SE by pilot projects first, both an in-process tailoring of all processes, methods, tools and structures (PMTS) required for the introduction and an in-process validation of the pilot scheme elaborated by the pilot projects are achieved. The presented method builds upon fundamental approaches to change management, which have been developed over many years in both research and practice. It has been validated by the industrial practice of SE transformation at German car manufacturers and suppliers. As a result, decision-makers, transformation managers and systems engineers are provided with a scientifically based and field-tested set of steps for the introduction of SE in their own company.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Graessler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2053-4701}},
  journal      = {{Design Science}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{SETup automotive: a Method for Systems Engineering Transformation in automotive industry}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/dsj.2025.10}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{60940,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Rarbach, Sven and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2942-6170}},
  journal      = {{Industry 4.0 Science}},
  number       = {{3}},
  publisher    = {{GITO mbH Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Strategic Product Planning Model – Digital twins for circular products and production processes}}},
  doi          = {{10.30844/i4se.25.3.24}},
  volume       = {{2025}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{61099,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Rarbach, Sven}},
  booktitle    = {{Procedia CIRP}},
  issn         = {{2212-8271}},
  pages        = {{207--212}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Model-based Impact Analysis for Engineering Sustainable Products in Value Creation Networks}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.037}},
  volume       = {{136}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62153,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  booktitle    = {{Procedia CIRP}},
  issn         = {{2212-8271}},
  pages        = {{936--942}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Structuring Systems Engineering Transformation: A three-step cycle of Transformation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.159}},
  volume       = {{136}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inbook{62161,
  author       = {{Vukadinovic, Vojin Sasa}},
  booktitle    = {{„bin weiblich, bin männlich, doppelt“. Queere DDR-Literatur}},
  editor       = {{Haug, Franziska}},
  pages        = {{128--144}},
  title        = {{{Der Traum ihrer Verkommenheit. Anmerkungen zu Christa Reinigs Frühwerk}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62165,
  abstract     = {{Academic publishing is both an indication of scientific contribution and a currency for career advancement. This dual role gives rise to a normative scientific conflict: Does the structural incentive to publish constitute a conflict of interest (COI) that ought to be disclosed? In this paper, we address this conflict through an action research approach, engaging collaboratively and reflexively to answer four related questions: (1) What evidence suggests that researchers face a (financial) COI when publishing? (2) What are the benefits and drawbacks of explicitly acknowledging that publications function as academic currency? (3) How should such conflicts be disclosed? (4) Do mechanisms such as pre-registration and registered reports resolve these concerns? This paper contends that while researchers are clearly incentivised to publish, this interest need not necessarily constitute a conflict or be explicitly disclosed. Treating this issue as a normative scientific conflict does reveal the need for a shift in how researchers understand and navigate the subjective, self-interested dimensions of their work. We propose four key responses: (1) integrating discussions of COIs and biases more extensively into undergraduate science education, (2) promoting greater reflexivity in everyday research practice (e.g., through reflexivity journals, peer-led audit groups, and the reintegration of discussions on the historicity and cultural nature of research into scientific publications), (3) critically investigating institutional incentives and journal policies, and (4) proactively adopting methodological safeguards such as pre-registration. By addressing this conflict through action research, we demonstrate how normative tensions in science can be made productive — supporting both critical reflection and structural improvement.}},
  author       = {{Acem, Ensar and Aczel, Balazs and Albayrak, Nihan and Brown, Nicholas J. L. and Dudda, Leonie A. and Elsherif, Mahmoud Medhat and Gjoneska, Biljana and Kowal, Marta and Krishna, Anand and Miłkoś, Szymon and Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola and Patel, Jay and Pypno-Blajda, Katarzyna and Scharlau, Ingrid and Verheyen, Steven and Zubaly, Benjamin}},
  issn         = {{0304-2421}},
  journal      = {{Theory and Society}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11186-025-09641-3}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{60013,
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Pottebaum, Jens and Nyhuis, Peter and Schmidt, Matthias and Grewe, Benedikt and Vollenkemper, Felix and Hesse, Thomas and Meinecke, Tim}},
  booktitle    = {{Stuttgarter Symposium für Produktentwicklung (SSP) 2025}},
  editor       = {{Hölzle, Katharina and Kreimeyer, Matthias and Roth, Daniel and Maier, Thomas and Riedel, Oliver}},
  location     = {{Stuttgart}},
  pages        = {{509--518}},
  publisher    = {{Fraunhofer IAO}},
  title        = {{{Evolving Design for Assembly, Disassembly and Reassembly into a new paradigm: Design-for-Capabilities with Hybrid Decision Support as an enabler for circular products}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{58236,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>In the engineering of complex technical systems, Systems Engineering (SE) is a key approach that is becoming increasingly relevant in more and more industries due to the ever-increasing complexity of systems. Over the decades of practical application and research, various specializations and forms of the Systems Engineering approach have developed, but there has so far been a lack of an overarching context and positioning in meaningful stages for the introduction of Systems Engineering in companies. For this reason, this research will systematize common Systems Engineering approaches and bring them together in a stage model for Systems Engineering. Based on a systematic literature review, use cases are identified for each approach and stage, which support companies in selecting an approach suitable for their own organization.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, Iris and Grewe, Benedikt}},
  issn         = {{2079-8954}},
  journal      = {{Systems}},
  keywords     = {{Systems Engineering Transformation, maturity, Systems Engineering stages, approaches, SE}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{MDPI AG}},
  title        = {{{Stages of Systems Engineering: An Analysis and Characterization of Systems Engineering Approaches}}},
  doi          = {{10.3390/systems13010053}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{62164,
  author       = {{Kuhlmann, Michael and Seebauer, Fritz and Wagner, Petra and Häb-Umbach, Reinhold}},
  booktitle    = {{Interspeech 2025}},
  publisher    = {{ISCA}},
  title        = {{{Towards Frame-level Quality Predictions of Synthetic Speech}}},
  doi          = {{10.21437/interspeech.2025-2190}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@phdthesis{62167,
  abstract     = {{Diese Dissertation befasst sich mit der Entwicklung eines induktiv-basierten Lokalisierungsverfahrens mittels planarer Spulen, das auf magnetischer Kopplung beruht. Grundlage ist die elektromagnetische Induktion, bei der sich die entstehende Spannung proportional zur Gegeninduktivität verhält. Das Verfahren arbeitet im physikalischen Nahfeld und im Frequenzbereich von einigen kHz bis MHz, um eine effiziente Kopplung ohne Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer Wellen zu gewährleisten. Im Vergleich zu etablierten Verfahren wie GPS oder Ultraschall zeigt die induktive Ortung Vorteile bei kurzer Reichweite, insbesondere durch hohe Genauigkeit im Zentimeterbereich und geringe Materialabhängigkeit. Zudem lässt sie sich in bestehende Technologien wie bei der drahtlosen Energieübertragung integrieren und durch Sensorfusion mit anderen Verfahren kombinieren. Zur Modellierung und Optimierung werden physikalische Eigenschaften von planaren Spulen und EM-Feldern analysiert und elektrische Ersatzschaltbilder eingesetzt. Die geometriebasierte Berechnung der Gegeninduktivität ermöglicht die Entwicklung und Bewertung geeigneter Ortungsalgorithmen. Stochastische Filterverfahren verbessern zusätzlich die Robustheit gegenüber Umgebungseinflüssen. Abschließend wird eine modulare Simulationsplattform vorgestellt, die als Grundlage für die Generierung von Trainingsdaten sowie zur Weiterentwicklung von Mess-, Ortungs- und Filtermethoden dient.}},
  author       = {{Lange, Sven}},
  pages        = {{247}},
  publisher    = {{Universitätsbibliothek Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Analyse und Modellierung eines induktiven Ortungsprozesses unter Berücksichtigung der elektromagnetischen Wechselwirkungen planarer Spulensysteme}}},
  doi          = {{10.17619/UNIPB/1-2436}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{61524,
  author       = {{Einwag, Jonathan-Markus and Steinfelder, Christian and Wartzack, Sandro and Brosius, Alexander and Goetz, Stefan}},
  issn         = {{1526-6125}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Manufacturing Processes}},
  pages        = {{179--191}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{From simulation to metamodel to experiment: Evaluating the prediction accuracy of polynomial regression models for clinch joint properties}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.09.059}},
  volume       = {{154}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}