@article{65682,
author = {{Vernholz, Mats and Sims, Craig and Treagust, David}},
journal = {{Education Sciences}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{782}},
title = {{{From Time-Saving to Skill-Building: Reframing Generative AI for Lesson-Planning—A Conceptual Design Paper}}},
doi = {{https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050782}},
volume = {{16}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@article{64789,
author = {{Beer, Fabian and Schulz, Christian}},
journal = {{RESET Journal (Recherches sciences sociale sur internet) Special Issue: Towards New Social and Historical Studies of Artificial Intelligence}},
publisher = {{Open Edition Journals}},
title = {{{AI has never been inherently interpretable: On a paradoxical origin of eXplainable AI (XAI)}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@techreport{65678,
author = {{Menne, Anna Lena and Schulz, Christian}},
title = {{{Unpacking [Whose] Imaginary: Reflections from a Workshop on Digital Imaginaries}}},
volume = {{1}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inproceedings{64211,
author = {{Wiebe, Vivien and Häsel-Weide, Uta}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Nineteenth ERME Topic Conference: Connecting the Learning of Mathematics Teaching to Practice}},
editor = {{Mosvold, R. and Fauskanger, J. and Ferretti, F. and Vondrová, N.}},
location = {{Prag}},
pages = {{122--129}},
title = {{{ Initiating and establishing mathematical practices of determining and transforming numbers as a foundational skill in fostering mathematics teaching}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@techreport{65686,
abstract = {{This paper empirically examines the relationship between market power and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores of banks in Europe and North America from 2010 to 2021, focusing separately on loan and deposit markets. Employing the Lerner Index as a non-structural measure of market power, our findings suggest that the impact of banking market power on ESG scores varies by region and the respective loan or deposit market. We find a negative effect of loan and deposit market power on ESG scores of European banks whereas the opposite effect can be observed for North American banks exhibiting loan market power. Further sensitivity analyses reveal that factors such as banks being Global Systemically Important (G-SIBs), and different ESG-related events like the Paris Agreement, the reemergence of the #MeToo movement and the COVID-19 pandemic may also explain the relationship between bank market power and ESG scores. Overall, our results underline that banking market power plays a pivotal role in enforcing ESG commitments in banking, offering key insights for policymakers, regulators, and banking stakeholders.}},
author = {{Voigt, Simone and Uhde, André}},
keywords = {{Market Power, ESG scores, European and North American banking markets}},
pages = {{55}},
title = {{{The impact of market power on banks' ESG scores - evidence from Europe and North America}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@techreport{65685,
abstract = {{Employing a unique hand-collected sample of 881 securitization transactions issued by 59 stock-listed banks across the EU-13 plus Switzerland over the period from 1997 to 2010, this paper empirically investigates if and how market power in the loan and deposit market may influence European banks’ incentives to engage in securitization activities. We construct product-specific residual Lerner Indices to measure market power in the loan and deposit market separately. Our results suggest that banks with higher loan and deposit market power securitize less, consistent with a reduced need for risk transfer and a reduced reliance on market-based funding. Various sensitivity analyses further show that these relationships vary across underlyings, issuance frequencies, and different time stages of securitization in Europe. Our findings contribute to the literature by disentangling loan and deposit market power as two further distinct determinants of securitization and thus, offer important insights regarding the ongoing policy debates on the consolidation of European banking markets and the revitalisation of the European securitization market.}},
author = {{Herwald, Sarah and Uhde, André}},
keywords = {{Securitization, market power, European banking}},
title = {{{Securitization and Market Power – Evidence from European Banks}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@techreport{65694,
abstract = {{This paper empirically investigates the relationship between market power and female board representation in large commercial banks in the EU-27 from 2020 to 2024. Using the Lerner Index as a proxy for market power and hand-collected data on female board representation, the findings suggest that increasing market power is detrimental to a bank’s likelihood of reaching the 33 percent gender diversity target for the board of directors, as proposed by the EU Directive EU2022/2381. The negative effect is especially pronounced for listed banks and systemically important banks, highlighting the importance of considering banking market structures (market power and competition) when enforcing regulatory diversity standards for those banks in particular.}},
author = {{Voigt, Simone}},
title = {{{The nexus of market power and female board representation in European banks}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@book{65691,
editor = {{Meier, Heiko and Kukuk, Marc and Sennefelder, Lisa}},
isbn = {{9783880207301}},
publisher = {{Feldhaus}},
title = {{{Planen. Bauen. Beteiligen. Bewegen. 16. Jahrestagung der dvs-Kommission „Sport und Raum“ vom 19.–20.09.2024 in Bad Driburg & Paderborn}}},
volume = {{Band 305}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@article{65697,
author = {{Breuing, Friederike and Kremer, H.-Hugo}},
issn = {{ 1618-8543}},
journal = {{bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik – online}},
number = {{49}},
pages = {{1--32}},
title = {{{Innovations- und Implementationsproblematik in der beruflichen Bildung – Studie zu Verständnissen und Prozessen im Kontext des InnoVET-Programms}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@book{65699,
author = {{Uhde, André and Paul, Stephan and Horsch, Andreas and Kaltofen, Daniel and Weiß, Gregor}},
isbn = {{978-3-7910-6577-9}},
title = {{{Unternehmerische Finanzierungspolitik - Eine wertorientierte Einführung}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inbook{63810,
author = {{Bürgel, Christoph and Siepmann, Dirk}},
booktitle = {{Pedagogical Linguistics, Selected Papers from Constructionist Approaches to Language Pedagogy 4, 7:1, 17–3.}},
editor = {{Piske, Thorsten and Herbst, Thomas }},
pages = {{7:1, 17–3}},
publisher = {{Piske, Thorsten & Herbst, }},
title = {{{A Comprehensive Grammar of Spoken and Written French as the First Fully Corpus-informed Grammar of French}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inbook{65692,
author = {{Kukuk, Marc and Meier, Heiko}},
booktitle = {{Planen. Beteiligen. Bauen. Bewegen. 16. Jahrestagung der dvs-Kommission „Sport und Raum“ vom 19.–20.09.2024 in Bad Driburg & Paderborn}},
editor = {{Meier, Heiko and Kukuk, Marc and Sennefelder, Lisa}},
isbn = {{9783880207301}},
pages = {{51--61}},
publisher = {{Feldhaus}},
title = {{{Kinderspielplätze aus der Perspektive von Erwachsenen - Nutzungsverhalten, Attraktivitätskritieren und Implikationen für Beteiligungsverfahren}}},
volume = {{Band 305}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inbook{65701,
author = {{Meier, Heiko and Kukuk, Marc and Sennefelder, Lisa}},
booktitle = {{Planen. Beteiligen. Bauen. Bewegen. 16. Jahrestagung der dvs-Kommission „Sport und Raum“ vom 19.–20.09.2024 in Bad Driburg & Paderborn}},
editor = {{Meier, Heiko and Kukuk, Marc and Sennefelder, Lisa}},
pages = {{9--14}},
publisher = {{Feldhaus}},
title = {{{Planen. Bauen. Beteiligen. Bewegen: Einführende Bemerkungen}}},
volume = {{Band 305}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inbook{65707,
author = {{Pinsch, Jan Christian}},
booktitle = {{Religious Diversity and Global Concerns}},
editor = {{Bergmann, Claudia and Temmerman, Johan}},
pages = {{169–184}},
title = {{{The Christian Right in Germany and the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). Religious othering and group-focused enmity}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inproceedings{65719,
author = {{Stoppel, Hans-Jürgen}},
editor = {{Doorman, Michiel and Schäfer, Elena and Maaß, Katja}},
location = {{Limassol, Cyprus}},
publisher = {{Verlag für wissenschaftliche Texte und Medien}},
title = {{{Construction of Polygons with Scratch and Computational Thinking}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@article{65730,
abstract = {{Abstract
Is explainable AI feasible and desirable, and are explanations of AI decisions always good? Many answer this question in the affirmative, but there is a growing discourse that is suspicious of the promises of explainable AI used to explain decisions towards users, considering it unfeasible, undesirable, and even potentially misleading. Could explainable AI be just a rhetorical foil? This paper proposes that, yes, explainable AI is a rhetorical technology but no, this does not necessarily make it undesirable. It starts by revisiting this debate according to the initial charge against rhetorics by Plato and Aristotle’s response, considering rhetoric pharmacologically, as not only a poison but also a cure for political life. It argues that, just as rhetoric was necessary to take care of the temporalities of public life, in court, the public event, and the assembly, so may explainable AI contribute to a rhetorical context. Yet, whether it does so is conditioned on the extent to which it cultivates the civic virtues relative to a respective context. The paper considers the examples of predictive policing, credit scoring, and prediction markets to argue about ideal states – civic virtues that may be cultivated in each appropriate context – and deviations that point at the risks of explainable AI to lead to domination, conformism, and political recalcitrance.}},
author = {{Reijers, Wessel}},
issn = {{0167-7411}},
journal = {{Topoi}},
publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
title = {{{Explainable AI as a Rhetorical Technology: Promoting Civic Virtue in the Age of AI}}},
doi = {{10.1007/s11245-026-10451-0}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@article{65733,
abstract = {{Abstract
In this paper, we study the computation of shortest paths within the
geometric amoebot model
, a commonly used model for programmable matter. Shortest paths are essential for various tasks and therefore have been heavily investigated in many different contexts. We consider the
reconfigurable circuit extension
of the model where the amoebot structure is able to interconnect amoebots by so-called circuits. These circuits permit the instantaneous transmission of simple signals between connected amoebots. We propose distributed algorithms for the
shortest path forest problem
where, given a set of
k
sources and a set of
$$\ell $$
ℓ
destinations, the amoebot structure has to compute a forest that connects each destination to its closest source on a shortest path. Our main results are two algorithms for hole-free structures. The first algorithm constructs a shortest path tree for a single source within
$$O(\log \ell )$$
O
(
log
ℓ
)
rounds, and the second algorithm a shortest path forest for an arbitrary number of sources within
$$O(\log n \log ^2 k)$$
O
(
log
n
log
2
k
)
rounds. The former algorithm also provides an
O
(1) rounds solution for the
single pair shortest path problem
(SPSP) and an
$$O(\log n)$$
O
(
log
n
)
rounds solution for the
single source shortest path problem
(SSSP) since these problems are special cases of the considered problem. Then, we adapt the latter algorithm to an offset version of the problem. This allows us to solve the problem for amoebot structures with holes within
$$O(h \log ^3 n)$$
O
(
h
log
3
n
)
rounds w.h.p. where
h
denotes the number of holes.
}},
author = {{Padalkin, Andreas and Scheideler, Christian}},
issn = {{0178-2770}},
journal = {{Distributed Computing}},
number = {{2}},
publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
title = {{{Polylogarithmic time algorithms for shortest path forests in programmable matter}}},
doi = {{10.1007/s00446-026-00505-2}},
volume = {{39}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@techreport{65724,
author = {{Strich, Franz and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam}},
pages = {{41}},
title = {{{Arbeitsplatz-KI: Zwölf Gestaltungsanker zur erfolgreichen Ko-Transformation von Mitarbeitenden, Prozessen & Strategie in der Finanzindustrie}}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@techreport{65737,
abstract = {{We examine German individuals' preferences for income and wealth taxation and, importantly, the interplay between these two tax instruments. While prior research often examines wealth tax preferences in isolation, actual tax systems consist of multiple interacting taxes. To capture this dynamic, we elicit preferred tax burdens in a large-scale online experiment with 2,702 participants randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: respondents state either an unspecified overall tax burden, separate income and wealth tax burdens, an income tax burden only, or a wealth tax burden only. Our baseline estimates reveal average (marginal) tax rates of approximately 17.4% (18.9%) for income and 4.1% (2.3%) for wealth. We find that participants associate wealth with an ability-to-pay taxes: when a wealth tax is not explicitly available, preferred income tax rates are approximately 30% higher. However, when both instruments are available, participants do not treat them as substitutes. Instead, they appear to treat the two taxes as separate mental bins: the standalone income and wealth tax burdens are combined in a notably additive manner, resulting in a significantly higher overall tax burden. Further, respondents apply implicit exemptions for low levels of wealth and favor a wealth tax base focused primarily on financial assets and real estate other than the primary residence.}},
author = {{Maiterth, Ralf and Piper, Yuri and Schneider, Cornelius}},
title = {{{Preferences for Taxing Wealth and Income}}},
doi = {{10.2139/ssrn.6832418}},
year = {{2026}},
}
@inbook{65738,
author = {{Kirsch, Alexander and Hellmich, Frank and Blumberg, Eva and Puppe, Ricardo}},
booktitle = {{Vorstellungen von Kindern zu Themenfeldern der Nachhaltigkeit}},
editor = {{Beudels, M and Henrichwark, C}},
pages = {{288--304}},
publisher = {{Klinkhardt}},
title = {{{Wie kommt der „grüne“ Strom in die Steckdose? – Eine multidimensionale Analyse der Vorstellungen von Grundschulkindern zu nachhaltiger Energienutzung}}},
year = {{2026}},
}