@article{35112, abstract = {{In der Mehrheit der deutschen Bundesländer ist ein Langzeitpraktikum (Praxissemester) Bestandteil der Lehramtsstudiengänge. Es zielt insbesondere darauf, Theorie und Praxis miteinander in Beziehung zu setzen. Trotz der gewichtigen Rolle, die den Mentor*innen dabei zugeschrieben wird, ist deren Perspektive noch wenig untersucht. Die empirisch auffindbaren Unterschiede in der Betreuung Studierender könnten u. a. auf unterschiedliche Vorstellungen von der Beziehung zwischen Theorie und Praxis seitens der Mentor*innen zurückzuführen sein. Diese Vorstellungen interessieren in der im Folgenden dargestellten explorativen Interviewstudie, deren Daten einer strukturierenden Inhaltsanalyse unterzogen wurden. Nachstehenden Forschungsfragen wird nachgegangen: 1) Sind die Mentor*innen auf die Aufgabe der Verknüpfung von Theorie und Praxis vorbereitet? 2) Werden in den Erzählungen der Mentor*innen zu gelingenden und misslingenden Betreuungserfahrungen Theorie-Praxis-Relationierungsfiguren sichtbar, wenn ja, welche und zeigen sich Bemühungen der Verknüpfung von Theorie und Praxis? 3) Werden in den Erzählungen der Mentor*innen zur eigenen Lerngeschichte Theorie-Praxis-Relationierungsfiguren sichtbar, wenn ja, welche und welche relative Rolle spielt das Ausbildungswissen aus Sicht der Mentor*innen für die Entwicklung ihres Könnens? 4) Welches Wissensverständnis der Mentor*innen zeigt sich in den Transkripten und welche Relevanz wird Wissen im Vergleich zu Erfahrung, Reflexion von Erfahrung und Persönlichkeit zugeschrieben? Es zeigt sich, dass die Mentor*innen das Theorie-Praxis-Verhältnis in den Gesprächen selten thematisieren, die Begriffe „Wissen“ und „Können“ synonym verwenden und der Erfahrung für die Entwicklung von Können eine höhere Relevanz beimessen als dem didaktischen und pädagogischen Ausbildungswissen. }}, author = {{Caruso, Carina and Neuweg, Georg Hans and Wagner, Michael and Harteis, Christian}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft}}, keywords = {{Lehrer*innenbildung, Mentoring, Praxissemester, Professionalisierung, Theorie-Praxis-Relationierung / Teacher training, Mentoring, Internship, Professionalization, Theory-practice-relation}}, publisher = {{Springer }}, title = {{{Theorie-Praxis-Relationierung im Praxissemester: Die Perspektive der Mentor*innen.}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11618-022-01123-x}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{55766, author = {{Grössl, Johannes}}, booktitle = {{Die Bedeutung von Gläubigen für die Theologie}}, editor = {{Grössl, Johannes and Riegel, Ulrich}}, isbn = {{978-3-17-042595-8}}, pages = {{9--26 (mit Ulrich Riegel) und 95--114}}, publisher = {{Kohlhammer}}, title = {{{Die Theologie und ihre Akteure" & "Praktizierte Glaubensreflexion als Erkenntnisort der Theologie}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{55769, author = {{Grössl, Johannes}}, booktitle = {{Mit dem Herzen denken. Konturen einer leidenschaftlichen Theologie der Welt [FS Roman Siebenrock]}}, editor = {{Bauer, Christian and Eckholt, Margit and Gmainer-Pranzl, Franz and Quast-Neulinger, Michaela}}, isbn = {{978-3-451-39165-1}}, pages = {{30--49}}, publisher = {{Herder}}, title = {{{Gottes Immanenz denken – auch im personalen Theismus?}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{55768, author = {{Grössl, Johannes}}, booktitle = {{Problemfall Offenbarung. Grund – Konzepte – Erkennbarkeit}}, editor = {{Nitsche, Bernhard and Remenyi, Matthias}}, isbn = {{978-3-451-39015-9}}, pages = {{413--433}}, publisher = {{Herder}}, title = {{{Erkenntnis durch Offenbarung als Gefahr für menschliche Autonomie?}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{55767, author = {{Grössl, Johannes and Kronau, Johannes}}, issn = {{0580-1400}}, journal = {{Münchner Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie}}, pages = {{230--245}}, title = {{{Extra narrationem nulla salus. Perspektiven eines narrativitätstheoretischen Ansatzes für die christliche Soteriologie}}}, volume = {{73:3}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inproceedings{55834, abstract = {{Performance of music in the home was the means by which most works were received before the advent of audio recordings and broadcasts, yet the notation sources that form our primary record of this culture have not been the subject of comprehensive or methodical study. Choices made by arrangers adapting music for domestic consumption – of instrumentation, abbreviation, or simplification – reflect the musical life of the 19th century, and can inform our understanding alongside contemporary accounts such as newspapers, adverts, and diaries. This position paper gives the background, motivation, and proposed approach of research currently being undertaken within the Beethoven in the House project. This will include a study of Steiner editions of Beethoven’s 7th and 8th Symphonies and Wellingtons Sieg, making a detailed comparison between arrangements, systematically identifying a core common to multiple versions, and asking if this reflects the stated values of the publisher. A second survey will look for patterns across a larger sample of lesser-known and poorly catalogued scores, collating emergent indicators of arrangers’ motivations within a narrative of the domestic market – the music industry of its day. Both studies will innovate digital methods which characterise arrangements as music encodings, including ‘sparse’ approaches to notation and annotation.}}, author = {{Page, Kevin R. and Kepper, Johannes and Siegert, Christine and Hankinson, Andrew and Lewis, David}}, booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2021}}, editor = {{Münnich, Stefan and Rizo, David}}, isbn = {{978-84-13-02173-7}}, keywords = {{BitH, mec-proceedings, mec-proceedings-2021}}, pages = {{117–123}}, publisher = {{Humanities Commons}}, title = {{{Beethoven in the House: Digital Studies of Domestic Music Arrangements}}}, doi = {{10.17613/389b-xx73}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inproceedings{55839, author = {{Cox, Susanne and Kepper, Johannes}}, booktitle = {{Music Encoding Conference Proceedings 2021}}, editor = {{Münnich, Stefan and Rizo, David}}, pages = {{85–95}}, publisher = {{Humanities Commons}}, title = {{{Encoding Genetic Processes II}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.17613/q6y4-9139}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inproceedings{55830, author = {{Lewis, David and Shibata, Elisabete and Saccomano, Mark and Rosendahl, Lisa and Kepper, Johannes and Hankinson, Andrew and Siegert, Christine and Page, Kevin}}, booktitle = {{9th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology}}, isbn = {{978-1-4503-9668-4}}, keywords = {{BitH}}, pages = {{10–18}}, publisher = {{ACM}}, title = {{{A model for annotating musical versions and arrangements across multiple documents and media}}}, doi = {{10.1145/3543882.3543891}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inproceedings{50286, author = {{Daniel-Söltenfuß, Desiree and Hagemeier, Daniel and Ludolph, Fabian}}, location = {{Universität Paderborn}}, title = {{{Educational Management on regional levels. Implications for vocational education}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{51000, author = {{Schlömer, Tobias and Kiepe, Karina and Thrun, Tim}}, booktitle = {{Intrapreneurship}}, editor = {{Kraus, Rafaela and Kreitenweis, Tanja and Jeraj, Brigita}}, pages = {{209–223}}, publisher = {{Springer Gabler}}, title = {{{Die Konstruktion von Geschäftsmodellen für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften: (k)eine exklusive Aufgabe des Managements?!}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{55877, author = {{Kiepe, Karina}}, booktitle = {{Ausbilder Handbuch}}, editor = {{Dietl, Stefan F. and Schmidt, Hermann and Weiß, Reinhold and Wittwer, Wolfgang}}, title = {{{Geschäftsmodelle als Lerngegenstände der betrieblichen Berufsausbildung}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{40018, author = {{Schmitz, Sabine}}, booktitle = {{Wegmarken der spanischen Literatur des 21. Jahrhunderts}}, editor = {{Schmelzer, Dagmar and Junkerjürgen, Ralf and Mecke, Jochen and Pöppel, Hubert}}, isbn = {{978-3-503-20994-1}}, pages = {{163--172}}, publisher = {{ESV}}, title = {{{Javier Marías: Berta Isla}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{39793, author = {{Schmitz, Sabine and Peters, Wilhelm and Peters, Dorothea}}, journal = {{Paderborner Universitätsreden}}, title = {{{Die Glaskunst in der Belgien-Leselounge der Universitätbibliothek Paderborn}}}, volume = {{158}}, year = {{2022}}, } @inbook{41165, author = {{Hartung, Olaf and Memminger, Josef}}, booktitle = {{Schreiben fachübergreifend fördern. Grundlagen und Praxisanregungen für Schule, Unterricht und Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung}}, editor = {{Busse, Vera and Müller, Nora and Siekmann, Lea}}, isbn = {{978-3-7727-1652-2 }}, pages = {{151--171}}, publisher = {{Friedrich Verlag GmbH}}, title = {{{‚Schreibsensibel‘ Geschichte unterrichten: Fachspezifische Textkompetenz als Gegenstand und Medium des historischen Lernens}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{36843, author = {{Eckel, Julia and Linseisen, Elisa}}, issn = {{2192-5445}}, journal = {{Rabbit Eye – Zeitschrift für Filmforschung}}, keywords = {{Anschaulichkeit, Anschauung, Film, Epistemologie audiovisueller Medien, Erklärbarkeit, Anschauen, Sichtbarkeit, Unsichtbarkeit}}, number = {{012}}, title = {{{Editorial: Anschaulichkeit – Wissen. Macht. Alternativen.}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @misc{36841, booktitle = {{Rabbit Eye - Zeitschrift für Filmforschung}}, editor = {{Eckel, Julia and Linseisen, Elisa}}, number = {{012}}, title = {{{Rabbit Eye: Anschaulichkeit}}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{36874, author = {{Su, Jiangling and González Orive, Alejandro and Grundmeier, Guido}}, issn = {{0169-4332}}, journal = {{Applied Surface Science}}, keywords = {{Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Condensed Matter Physics, Surfaces and Interfaces, General Physics and Astronomy, General Chemistry}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Nano-FTIR and chemical force analysis of electrografted aryldiazonium salts on ODT-microcontact printed Au-surfaces}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155355}}, volume = {{609}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{36872, author = {{Bobzin, K. and Kalscheuer, C. and Grundmeier, Guido and de los Arcos, T. and Kollmann, S. and Carlet, M.}}, issn = {{0257-8972}}, journal = {{Surface and Coatings Technology}}, keywords = {{Materials Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Surfaces and Interfaces, Condensed Matter Physics, General Chemistry}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Oxidation stability of chromium aluminum oxynitride hard coatings}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128927}}, volume = {{449}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{36873, author = {{Neßlinger, Vanessa and Welzel, Stefan and Rieker, Florian and Meinderink, Dennis and Nieken, Ulrich and Grundmeier, Guido}}, issn = {{1862-832X}}, journal = {{Macromolecular Reaction Engineering}}, keywords = {{Polymers and Plastics, General Chemical Engineering, General Chemistry}}, publisher = {{Wiley}}, title = {{{Thin Organic‐Inorganic Anti‐Fouling Hybrid‐Films for Microreactor Components}}}, doi = {{10.1002/mren.202200043}}, year = {{2022}}, } @article{34264, abstract = {{In industrial x-ray computed tomography (CT), the application of more complex scan paths in comparison to the typical circular trajectory (${360}^{\circ}$ rotation of the measurement object) can extend the potential of CT. One way to enable such 3D scan trajectories is to use a 6-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) object manipulator system. In our case, a hexapod is mounted on top of the rotary table of a commercial CT scanner. This allows for adaptive tilting of the measurement object during the scan. For high accuracy, the geometry calibration of such setups is typically done using the x-ray projections of a calibrated multi-sphere object. Contrary to this, here, we demonstrate a procedure that is based on only a single sphere and can therefore experimentally be implemented with low effort. Using the intrinsic geometry parameters of the CT device as prior information, the hexapod coordinate system with respect to the CT machine coordinate system is determined by means of a one-step optimization approach. The resulting parameters are used to calculate projection matrices that enable the volume reconstruction for 3D scan trajectories. The method is validated using simulated x-ray images and experimental investigations including dimensional measurements. For the used setup, geometric measurement results for 3D scan trajectories that are calibrated with the presented method show in sum increased errors compared to the circular scans. A limited pose accuracy of the manipulator system is discussed as a potential cause. The results nevertheless indicate that the presented method is generally feasible for dimensional CT measurements provided that the pose accuracy is sufficient. The calibration procedure can therefore be a low-cost and easier to implement alternative compared to trajectory calibration methods based on multi-sphere objects, but with a tendency towards lower measurement accuracy. The methodology can in principle be transferred to different setups with 6-DOF manipulator systems, e.g. C-arm CT devices with a robot arm.}}, author = {{Butzhammer, Lorenz and Müller, Andreas Michael and Hausotte, Tino}}, issn = {{0957-0233}}, journal = {{Measurement Science and Technology}}, keywords = {{Applied Mathematics, Instrumentation, Engineering (miscellaneous)}}, number = {{1}}, publisher = {{IOP Publishing}}, title = {{{Calibration of 3D scan trajectories for an industrial computed tomography setup with 6-DOF object manipulator system using a single sphere}}}, doi = {{10.1088/1361-6501/ac9856}}, volume = {{34}}, year = {{2022}}, }