Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern
R.E. Hagengruber, in: Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29, 2018, pp. 57–62.
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Conference Paper
| English
Department
Publishing Year
Proceedings Title
Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29
Page
57-62
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Hagengruber RE. Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern. In: Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29. ; 2018:57-62.
Hagengruber, R. E. (2018). Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern. Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29, 57–62.
@inproceedings{Hagengruber_2018, title={Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern}, booktitle={Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29}, author={Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}, year={2018}, pages={57–62} }
Hagengruber, Ruth Edith. “Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern.” In Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29, 57–62, 2018.
R. E. Hagengruber, “Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern,” in Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29, 2018, pp. 57–62.
Hagengruber, Ruth Edith. “Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern.” Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29, 2018, pp. 57–62.
Google Scholar