<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3">

<genre>conference paper</genre>

<titleInfo><title>A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels</title></titleInfo>





<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Reinhold</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Haeb-Umbach</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role><identifier type="local">242</identifier></name>







<name type="corporate">
  <namePart></namePart>
  <identifier type="local">54</identifier>
  <role>
    <roleTerm type="text">department</roleTerm>
  </role>
</name>








<abstract lang="eng">The common basis of coherent and differentially coherent detection is considered from the viewpoint of carrier recovery as the estimation of fading distortion. In the differentially coherent receiver a simple estimate of the fading distortion is used whereas the coherent receiver uses the optimal estimate. The bit error rates (BERs) for M-ary PSK (phase-shift keyed) and DPSK (double phase-shift keyed) transmission are calculated using a single method of calculation for both detection schemes. The calculation takes into account nonperfect carrier recovery, cochannel interference, and diversity. The results allow a direct comparison of the two schemes and show that coherent detection is preferable in many realistic fading environments.</abstract>

<originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1988</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</language>



<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia</title></titleInfo>
<part>
</part>
</relatedItem>


<extension>
<bibliographicCitation>
<ama>Haeb-Umbach R. A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels. In: &lt;i&gt;International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia&lt;/i&gt;. ; 1988.</ama>
<bibtex>@inproceedings{Haeb-Umbach_1988, title={A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels}, booktitle={International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia}, author={Haeb-Umbach, Reinhold}, year={1988} }</bibtex>
<mla>Haeb-Umbach, Reinhold. “A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels.” &lt;i&gt;International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia&lt;/i&gt;, 1988.</mla>
<chicago>Haeb-Umbach, Reinhold. “A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels.” In &lt;i&gt;International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia&lt;/i&gt;, 1988.</chicago>
<short>R. Haeb-Umbach, in: International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia, 1988.</short>
<apa>Haeb-Umbach, R. (1988). A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels. In &lt;i&gt;International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia&lt;/i&gt;.</apa>
<ieee>R. Haeb-Umbach, “A Comparison of Coherent and Differentially Coherent Detection Schemes for Fading Channels,” in &lt;i&gt;International Conference on Vehicular Technology, Philadelphia&lt;/i&gt;, 1988.</ieee>
</bibliographicCitation>
</extension>
<recordInfo><recordIdentifier>11783</recordIdentifier><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2019-07-12T05:28:10Z</recordCreationDate><recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2022-01-06T06:51:08Z</recordChangeDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
