{"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"Communications of the AIS","date_updated":"2022-06-10T06:38:58Z","type":"journal_article","author":[{"full_name":"Schryen, Guido","id":"72850","last_name":"Schryen","first_name":"Guido"},{"first_name":"Gerit","last_name":"Wagner","full_name":"Wagner, Gerit"},{"full_name":"Benlian, Alexander","last_name":"Benlian","first_name":"Alexander"},{"last_name":"Paré","full_name":"Paré, Guy","first_name":"Guy"}],"intvolume":" 46","status":"public","year":"2020","citation":{"bibtex":"@article{Schryen_Wagner_Benlian_Paré_2020, title={A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field}, volume={46}, DOI={10.17705/1CAIS.04607}, journal={Communications of the AIS}, author={Schryen, Guido and Wagner, Gerit and Benlian, Alexander and Paré, Guy}, year={2020}, pages={134–186} }","ama":"Schryen G, Wagner G, Benlian A, Paré G. A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field. Communications of the AIS. 2020;46:134-186. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.04607","mla":"Schryen, Guido, et al. “A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field.” Communications of the AIS, vol. 46, 2020, pp. 134–86, doi:10.17705/1CAIS.04607.","ieee":"G. Schryen, G. Wagner, A. Benlian, and G. Paré, “A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field,” Communications of the AIS, vol. 46, pp. 134–186, 2020, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.04607.","chicago":"Schryen, Guido, Gerit Wagner, Alexander Benlian, and Guy Paré. “A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field.” Communications of the AIS 46 (2020): 134–86. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04607.","short":"G. Schryen, G. Wagner, A. Benlian, G. Paré, Communications of the AIS 46 (2020) 134–186.","apa":"Schryen, G., Wagner, G., Benlian, A., & Paré, G. (2020). A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field. Communications of the AIS, 46, 134–186. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04607"},"user_id":"72850","publication_identifier":{"issn":[" 1529-3181"]},"department":[{"_id":"277"}],"_id":"11946","title":"A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field","volume":46,"ddc":["000"],"file":[{"file_id":"16115","file_name":"RA-18-198.pdf","date_created":"2020-02-26T18:12:29Z","date_updated":"2020-03-05T10:36:15Z","file_size":1146830,"creator":"schryen","content_type":"application/pdf","access_level":"open_access","relation":"main_file"}],"page":"134-186","doi":"10.17705/1CAIS.04607","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Literature reviews (LRs) play an important role in the development of domain knowledge in all fields. Yet, we observe a\r\nlack of insights into the activities with which LRs actually develop knowledge. To address this important gap, we (1)\r\nderive knowledge building activities from the extant literature on LRs, (2) suggest a knowledge-based typology of LRs\r\nthat complements existing typologies, and (3) apply the suggested typology in an empirical study that explores how LRs\r\nwith different goals and methodologies have contributed to knowledge development. The analysis of 240 LRs published\r\nin 40 renowned IS journals between 2000 and 2014 allows us to draw a detailed picture of knowledge development\r\nachieved by one of the most important genres in the IS field. An overarching contribution of our work is to unify extant\r\nconceptualizations of LRs by clarifying and illustrating how LRs apply different methodologies in a range of knowledge\r\nbuilding activities to achieve their goals with respect to theory."}],"oa":"1","has_accepted_license":"1","date_created":"2019-07-12T12:01:02Z","file_date_updated":"2020-03-05T10:36:15Z","keyword":["Literature review","knowledge development","knowledge building activities","knowledge-based typology","information systems research"]}