{"user_id":"68607","citation":{"short":"T. Kourouxous, T. Bauer, Business Research 12 (2019) 209–239.","apa":"Kourouxous, T., & Bauer, T. (2019). Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making. Business Research, 12(1), 209–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7","chicago":"Kourouxous, Thomas, and Thomas Bauer. “Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making.” Business Research 12, no. 1 (2019): 209–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7.","bibtex":"@article{Kourouxous_Bauer_2019, title={Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making}, volume={12}, DOI={10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7}, number={1}, journal={Business Research}, author={Kourouxous, Thomas and Bauer, Thomas}, year={2019}, pages={209–239} }","mla":"Kourouxous, Thomas, and Thomas Bauer. “Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making.” Business Research, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019, pp. 209–39, doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7.","ama":"Kourouxous T, Bauer T. Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making. Business Research. 2019;12(1):209-239. doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7","ieee":"T. Kourouxous and T. Bauer, “Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making,” Business Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 209–239, 2019."},"volume":12,"_id":"14905","title":"Violations of Dominance in Decision-Making","department":[{"_id":"187"},{"_id":"635"}],"publication_identifier":{"issn":["2198-3402","2198-2627"]},"author":[{"first_name":"Thomas","full_name":"Kourouxous, Thomas","id":"66936","last_name":"Kourouxous"},{"first_name":"Thomas","last_name":"Bauer","full_name":"Bauer, Thomas"}],"year":"2019","status":"public","intvolume":" 12","date_updated":"2022-01-06T06:52:10Z","type":"journal_article","publication":"Business Research","main_file_link":[{"url":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7"}],"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"date_created":"2019-11-13T08:27:11Z","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"A key premise underlying most of the economic literature is that rational decision-makers will choose dominant strategies over dominated alternatives. However, prior literature in various disciplines including business, psychology, and economics document a series of phenomena associated with violations of the dominance principle in decision-making. In this comprehensive review, we discuss conditions under which people violate the dominance principle in decision-making. When presenting violations of dominance in empirical and experimental studies, we differentiate between absolute, statewise, and stochastic (first- and second-order) violations of dominance. Furthermore, we categorize the literature by the leading causes for dominance violations: framing, reference points, certainty effects, bounded rationality, and emotional responses."}],"page":"209-239","doi":"10.1007/s40685-019-0093-7","publication_status":"published","issue":"1"}