{"editor":[{"full_name":"Beaney, Michael","last_name":"Beaney","first_name":"Michael"},{"first_name":"Erich H.","full_name":"Reck, Erich H.","last_name":"Reck"}],"abstract":[{"text":"Rezension: Zbl. Math. 1100.03006 (I. Grattan-Guinness)","lang":"eng"}],"place":"London/ New York","publisher":"Routledge","citation":{"mla":"Peckhaus, Volker. “Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck).” <i>Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context</i>, edited by Michael Beaney and Erich H. Reck, Routledge, 2005, pp. 176–90.","ieee":"V. Peckhaus, “Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck),” in <i>Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context</i>, M. Beaney and E. H. Reck, Eds. London/ New York: Routledge, 2005, pp. 176–190.","apa":"Peckhaus, V. (2005). Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck). In M. Beaney &#38; E. H. Reck (Eds.), <i>Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context</i> (pp. 176–190). Routledge.","short":"V. Peckhaus, in: M. Beaney, E.H. Reck (Eds.), Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context, Routledge, London/ New York, 2005, pp. 176–190.","bibtex":"@inbook{Peckhaus_2005, place={London/ New York}, title={Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck)}, booktitle={Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context}, publisher={Routledge}, author={Peckhaus, Volker}, editor={Beaney, Michael and Reck, Erich H.}, year={2005}, pages={176–190} }","chicago":"Peckhaus, Volker. “Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck).” In <i>Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context</i>, edited by Michael Beaney and Erich H. Reck, 176–90. London/ New York: Routledge, 2005.","ama":"Peckhaus V. Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck). In: Beaney M, Reck EH, eds. <i>Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context</i>. Routledge; 2005:176-190."},"user_id":"59882","department":[{"_id":"520"}],"publication":"Gottlob Frege. Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Bd. 1: Frege’s Philosophy in Context","date_created":"2020-08-03T13:00:40Z","title":"Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted (Wiederabdruck)","type":"book_chapter","page":"176-190","_id":"17563","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"year":"2005","status":"public","author":[{"first_name":"Volker","id":"391","last_name":"Peckhaus","full_name":"Peckhaus, Volker"}],"date_updated":"2022-03-23T10:15:23Z"}