{"department":[{"_id":"520"}],"citation":{"short":"V. Peckhaus, Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete (2005).","chicago":"Peckhaus, Volker. “Vandoulakis, Ioannis, ‘Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?’, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181.” <i>Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete</i>, 2005.","ama":"Peckhaus V. Vandoulakis, Ioannis, “Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?”, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181. <i>Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete</i>. Published online 2005.","bibtex":"@article{Peckhaus_2005, title={Vandoulakis, Ioannis, “Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?”, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181}, number={Zbl. 1060.01003}, journal={Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete}, author={Peckhaus, Volker}, year={2005} }","mla":"Peckhaus, Volker. “Vandoulakis, Ioannis, ‘Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?’, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181.” <i>Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete</i>, Zbl. 1060.01003, 2005.","ieee":"V. Peckhaus, “Vandoulakis, Ioannis, ‘Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?’, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181,” <i>Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete</i>. 2005.","apa":"Peckhaus, V. (2005). Vandoulakis, Ioannis, “Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?”, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181. In <i>Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete</i> (Zbl. 1060.01003)."},"user_id":"59882","date_updated":"2022-06-14T13:24:27Z","author":[{"full_name":"Peckhaus, Volker","last_name":"Peckhaus","id":"391","first_name":"Volker"}],"status":"public","language":[{"iso":"ger"}],"_id":"18516","year":"2005","type":"review","article_number":"Zbl. 1060.01003","publication":"Zentralblatt für Mathematik und ihre Grenzgebiete","related_material":{"link":[{"url":"https://zbmath.org/?q=an%3A1060.01003","relation":"confirmation"}]},"date_created":"2020-08-28T06:36:27Z","title":"Vandoulakis, Ioannis, “Was Euclid’s Approach to Arithmetic Axiomatic?”, In: Oriens Occidens 2 (1998), 141–181"}