--- res: bibo_abstract: - 'Challenges in decisions on technical changes are the lack of knowledge about the expected impact and change propagation. Currently, no literature study contains a systematic differentiation and evaluation of existing approaches, which is a prerequisite for practitioners to select a suitable approach. This research aims at defining differentiation criteria as well as generally applicable requirements for evaluation. A four-step approach is used: systematic literature review on approaches for impact analysis of engineering changes (1), categorization and prioritization of approaches based on reoccuring elements (2), derivation of context specific requirements for evaluation (3), and evaluation of approaches (4). The result indicates existing potential of object-oriented modeling approaches.@eng' bibo_authorlist: - foaf_Person: foaf_givenName: Iris foaf_name: Gräßler, Iris foaf_surname: Gräßler foaf_workInfoHomepage: http://www.librecat.org/personId=47565 orcid: 0000-0001-5765-971X - foaf_Person: foaf_givenName: Dominik foaf_name: Wiechel, Dominik foaf_surname: Wiechel foaf_workInfoHomepage: http://www.librecat.org/personId=67161 bibo_doi: 10.35199/dfx2021.12 dct_date: 2021^xs_gYear dct_language: eng dct_subject: - Engineering Change Management - Impact Analysis - Engineering Changes - Model-based Systems Engineering - Product Developmen dct_title: Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen des Engineering Change Managements@ ...