{"article_type":"original","date_updated":"2022-01-11T16:07:08Z","type":"journal_article","publication":"Teaching in Higher Education","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"27117","title":"The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions","publication_identifier":{"issn":["1356-2517","1470-1294"]},"user_id":"90339","citation":{"ieee":"P. Pineda and I. Steinhardt, “The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions,” <i>Teaching in Higher Education</i>, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351\">10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351</a>.","ama":"Pineda P, Steinhardt I. The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions. <i>Teaching in Higher Education</i>. Published online 2020:1-21. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351\">10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351</a>","mla":"Pineda, Pedro, and Isabel Steinhardt. “The Debate on Student Evaluations of Teaching: Global Convergence Confronts Higher Education Traditions.” <i>Teaching in Higher Education</i>, 2020, pp. 1–21, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351\">10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351</a>.","apa":"Pineda, P., &#38; Steinhardt, I. (2020). The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions. <i>Teaching in Higher Education</i>, 1–21. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351\">https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351</a>","bibtex":"@article{Pineda_Steinhardt_2020, title={The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351\">10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351</a>}, journal={Teaching in Higher Education}, author={Pineda, Pedro and Steinhardt, Isabel}, year={2020}, pages={1–21} }","short":"P. Pineda, I. Steinhardt, Teaching in Higher Education (2020) 1–21.","chicago":"Pineda, Pedro, and Isabel Steinhardt. “The Debate on Student Evaluations of Teaching: Global Convergence Confronts Higher Education Traditions.” <i>Teaching in Higher Education</i>, 2020, 1–21. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351\">https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351</a>."},"status":"public","year":"2020","extern":"1","author":[{"first_name":"Pedro","full_name":"Pineda, Pedro","last_name":"Pineda"},{"orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189","first_name":"Isabel","full_name":"Steinhardt, Isabel","last_name":"Steinhardt","id":"90339"}],"doi":"10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351","page":"1-21","publication_status":"published","keyword":["academic discourse","bibliometric review","quality assurance","student evaluation of teaching","teaching evaluation"],"date_created":"2021-11-03T13:01:53Z","quality_controlled":"1","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Through co-occurrence analysis of 1139 documents (1964-2018) we identified trends in the discussions about the implementation of student teaching evaluation (SET). We found that: (1) Attention to SET originated in the US in the 1970s, spreading to German-speaking countries in the mid-1990s and continuing in China and Latin America in the early 2000s. (2) SET is commonly viewed as a control tool deserving methodological improvement, while bias is debated in the US. We also found local trajectories: (3) Whereas in the US and Latin America SET is primarily seen as a management tool, German-speaking and Chinese authors reflect more on improving teaching. Chinese scholars consider SET a valid instrument for state control associated with artificial intelligence. Also, (4) SET is commonly used in medical education in the US and the German-speaking region and in physical education in China. We conclude that SET is discussed cross-nationally but affected by national path dependencies."}]}