---
_id: '27117'
abstract:
- lang: eng
text: 'Through co-occurrence analysis of 1139 documents (1964-2018) we identified
trends in the discussions about the implementation of student teaching evaluation
(SET). We found that: (1) Attention to SET originated in the US in the 1970s,
spreading to German-speaking countries in the mid-1990s and continuing in China
and Latin America in the early 2000s. (2) SET is commonly viewed as a control
tool deserving methodological improvement, while bias is debated in the US. We
also found local trajectories: (3) Whereas in the US and Latin America SET is
primarily seen as a management tool, German-speaking and Chinese authors reflect
more on improving teaching. Chinese scholars consider SET a valid instrument for
state control associated with artificial intelligence. Also, (4) SET is commonly
used in medical education in the US and the German-speaking region and in physical
education in China. We conclude that SET is discussed cross-nationally but affected
by national path dependencies.'
article_type: original
author:
- first_name: Pedro
full_name: Pineda, Pedro
last_name: Pineda
- first_name: Isabel
full_name: Steinhardt, Isabel
id: '90339'
last_name: Steinhardt
orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-6189
citation:
ama: 'Pineda P, Steinhardt I. The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global
convergence confronts higher education traditions. Teaching in Higher Education.
Published online 2020:1-21. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351'
apa: 'Pineda, P., & Steinhardt, I. (2020). The Debate on student evaluations
of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions. Teaching
in Higher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351'
bibtex: '@article{Pineda_Steinhardt_2020, title={The Debate on student evaluations
of teaching: global convergence confronts higher education traditions}, DOI={10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351},
journal={Teaching in Higher Education}, author={Pineda, Pedro and Steinhardt,
Isabel}, year={2020}, pages={1–21} }'
chicago: 'Pineda, Pedro, and Isabel Steinhardt. “The Debate on Student Evaluations
of Teaching: Global Convergence Confronts Higher Education Traditions.” Teaching
in Higher Education, 2020, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351.'
ieee: 'P. Pineda and I. Steinhardt, “The Debate on student evaluations of teaching:
global convergence confronts higher education traditions,” Teaching in Higher
Education, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351.'
mla: 'Pineda, Pedro, and Isabel Steinhardt. “The Debate on Student Evaluations of
Teaching: Global Convergence Confronts Higher Education Traditions.” Teaching
in Higher Education, 2020, pp. 1–21, doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351.'
short: P. Pineda, I. Steinhardt, Teaching in Higher Education (2020) 1–21.
date_created: 2021-11-03T13:01:53Z
date_updated: 2022-01-11T16:07:08Z
doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351
extern: '1'
keyword:
- academic discourse
- bibliometric review
- quality assurance
- student evaluation of teaching
- teaching evaluation
language:
- iso: eng
page: 1-21
publication: Teaching in Higher Education
publication_identifier:
issn:
- 1356-2517
- 1470-1294
publication_status: published
quality_controlled: '1'
status: public
title: 'The Debate on student evaluations of teaching: global convergence confronts
higher education traditions'
type: journal_article
user_id: '90339'
year: '2020'
...