<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3">

<genre>working Paper</genre>

<titleInfo><title>The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician&apos;s Prescription Decision - An Experiment</title></titleInfo>





<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Vanessa</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Hilleringmann</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role><identifier type="local">34491</identifier></name>







<name type="corporate">
  <namePart></namePart>
  <identifier type="local">280</identifier>
  <role>
    <roleTerm type="text">department</roleTerm>
  </role>
</name>

<name type="corporate">
  <namePart></namePart>
  <identifier type="local">475</identifier>
  <role>
    <roleTerm type="text">department</roleTerm>
  </role>
</name>








<abstract lang="eng">Focusing on a physician&apos;s relationship to a briber and a patient, this experiment analyzes the influence of a bribe on a physician&apos;s treatment decision. We conduct a partner treatment, in which briber and physician play together for the whole experiment and a stranger treament, where briber and physician are re-matched every period. With the help of the two treatments, we vary the relative reciprocity between the physician and the two other actors, briber and patient. Additionally we use a follow up questionnaire to measure the behavioral motivation of the participants. We find that reciprocity leads to bribery relationships: In the partner treatment physicians act corruptly more often. Just the variation of the relative reciprocity between the treatments shows differences in the behavior of the subjects. Differences in the participants&apos; preferences deliver no explanation for their behavior in our experiment.</abstract>

<originInfo><publisher>CIE Working Paper Series</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2018</dateIssued>
</originInfo>

<subject><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relationship</topic>
</subject>


<relatedItem type="host">
<part>
</part>
</relatedItem>


<extension>
<bibliographicCitation>
<ama>Hilleringmann V. &lt;i&gt;The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment&lt;/i&gt;. CIE Working Paper Series; 2018.</ama>
<ieee>V. Hilleringmann, &lt;i&gt;The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment&lt;/i&gt;. CIE Working Paper Series, 2018.</ieee>
<chicago>Hilleringmann, Vanessa. &lt;i&gt;The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment&lt;/i&gt;. CIE Working Paper Series, 2018.</chicago>
<apa>Hilleringmann, V. (2018). &lt;i&gt;The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment&lt;/i&gt;. CIE Working Paper Series.</apa>
<bibtex>@book{Hilleringmann_2018, title={The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment}, publisher={CIE Working Paper Series}, author={Hilleringmann, Vanessa}, year={2018} }</bibtex>
<short>V. Hilleringmann, The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment, CIE Working Paper Series, 2018.</short>
<mla>Hilleringmann, Vanessa. &lt;i&gt;The Influence of Bribery and Relative Reciprocity on a Physician’s Prescription Decision - An Experiment&lt;/i&gt;. CIE Working Paper Series, 2018.</mla>
</bibliographicCitation>
</extension>
<recordInfo><recordIdentifier>3101</recordIdentifier><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2018-06-07T07:42:31Z</recordCreationDate><recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2022-01-06T06:58:55Z</recordChangeDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
