---
res:
  bibo_abstract:
  - "How do ideas come into being? Our contribution takes its starting point in an
    observation\r\nwe made in empirical data from a prior study. The data center around
    an instant of an\r\nacademic writer’s thinking during the revision of a scientific
    paper. Through a detailed\r\ndiscourse-oriented micro-analysis, we zoom in on
    the writer’s thinking activity and uncover\r\nthe genesis of a complex idea through
    a sequence of interrelated moments. These\r\nmoments feature different degrees
    of “crystallization” of the idea; from gestures, a sketch,\r\na short written
    note, oral explanations to a final spelled-out written argument. For this\r\ncontribution,
    we re-analyze the material, asking how the idea gets formed during the\r\nthinking
    process and how it reaches a tangible form, which is understandable both for\r\nthe
    thinker and for other persons. We root our analysis in a notion of language as
    social,\r\nembodied, and dialogical activity, drawing on concepts from Humboldt,
    Jakubinskij, and\r\nVygotsky. We focus our analysis on three conceptual nodes.
    The first node is the ebbing\r\nand advancing of language in idea formation –
    observable as a trajectory through linguistically more condensed or more expanded
    utterance forms. The second node is the degree of objectification that the idea
    reaches when it is performed differently in a variety of addressivity constellations,
    i.e., whether and how it becomes understandable to the thinker and to others in
    the social sphere. Finally, the third node is the saturation of the idea through
    what we call intrapersonal intertextuality, i.e., its complex and dialogically
    related re-articulations in a sequence of formative moments. With these considerations,
    we articulate a clear consequence for theorizing thinking. We hold that thinking
    is social, embodied, and dialogically organized because it is entangled with language.
    Ideas come into being and become understandable and communicable to other persons
    only by and within their different, yet, intertextually related formations.@eng"
  bibo_authorlist:
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Andrea
      foaf_name: Karsten, Andrea
      foaf_surname: Karsten
      foaf_workInfoHomepage: http://www.librecat.org/personId=53917
    orcid: 0000-0003-0194-2000
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Marie-Cécile
      foaf_name: Bertau, Marie-Cécile
      foaf_surname: Bertau
  bibo_doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02355
  bibo_volume: 10
  dct_date: 2019^xs_gYear
  dct_language: eng
  dct_subject:
  - idea formation
  - language activity
  - objectification
  - intrapersonal intertextuality
  - articulation
  - Jakubinskij
  - Vygotsky
  - Humboldt
  dct_title: 'How ideas come into being: Tracing intertextual moments in grades of
    objectification and publicness@'
...