{"intvolume":"        15","status":"public","year":"2022","publisher":"MDPI AG","author":[{"first_name":"Osama","last_name":"Abdelaal","full_name":"Abdelaal, Osama"},{"full_name":"Hengsbach, Florian","last_name":"Hengsbach","first_name":"Florian"},{"first_name":"Mirko","full_name":"Schaper, Mirko","id":"43720","last_name":"Schaper"},{"first_name":"Kay-Peter","last_name":"Hoyer","id":"48411","full_name":"Hoyer, Kay-Peter"}],"publication_identifier":{"issn":["1996-1944"]},"department":[{"_id":"9"},{"_id":"158"}],"title":"LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio","_id":"32188","volume":15,"citation":{"ieee":"O. Abdelaal, F. Hengsbach, M. Schaper, and K.-P. Hoyer, “LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio,” <i>Materials</i>, vol. 15, no. 12, Art. no. 4072, 2022, doi: <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072\">10.3390/ma15124072</a>.","mla":"Abdelaal, Osama, et al. “LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio.” <i>Materials</i>, vol. 15, no. 12, 4072, MDPI AG, 2022, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072\">10.3390/ma15124072</a>.","ama":"Abdelaal O, Hengsbach F, Schaper M, Hoyer K-P. LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio. <i>Materials</i>. 2022;15(12). doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072\">10.3390/ma15124072</a>","bibtex":"@article{Abdelaal_Hengsbach_Schaper_Hoyer_2022, title={LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio}, volume={15}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072\">10.3390/ma15124072</a>}, number={124072}, journal={Materials}, publisher={MDPI AG}, author={Abdelaal, Osama and Hengsbach, Florian and Schaper, Mirko and Hoyer, Kay-Peter}, year={2022} }","apa":"Abdelaal, O., Hengsbach, F., Schaper, M., &#38; Hoyer, K.-P. (2022). LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio. <i>Materials</i>, <i>15</i>(12), Article 4072. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072\">https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072</a>","short":"O. Abdelaal, F. Hengsbach, M. Schaper, K.-P. Hoyer, Materials 15 (2022).","chicago":"Abdelaal, Osama, Florian Hengsbach, Mirko Schaper, and Kay-Peter Hoyer. “LPBF Manufactured Functionally Graded Lattice Structures Obtained by Graded Density and Hybrid Poisson’s Ratio.” <i>Materials</i> 15, no. 12 (2022). <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072\">https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124072</a>."},"user_id":"43720","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"Materials","type":"journal_article","date_updated":"2023-04-27T16:34:46Z","quality_controlled":"1","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"<jats:p>The additive manufacturing (AM) of innovative lattice structures with unique mechanical properties has received widespread attention due to the capability of AM processes to fabricate freeform and intricate structures. The most common way to characterize the additively manufactured lattice structures is via the uniaxial compression test. However, although there are many applications for which lattice structures are designed for bending (e.g., sandwich panels cores and some medical implants), limited attention has been paid toward investigating the flexural behavior of metallic AM lattice structures with tunable internal architectures. The purpose of this study was to experimentally investigate the flexural behavior of AM Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures with graded density and hybrid Poisson’s ratio (PR). Four configurations of lattice structure beams with positive, negative, hybrid PR, and a novel hybrid PR with graded density were manufactured via the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) AM process and tested under four-point bending. The manufacturability, microstructure, micro-hardness, and flexural properties of the lattices were evaluated. During the bending tests, different failure mechanisms were observed, which were highly dependent on the type of lattice geometry. The best response in terms of absorbed energy was obtained for the functionally graded hybrid PR (FGHPR) structure. Both the FGHPR and hybrid PR (HPR) structured showed a 78.7% and 62.9% increase in the absorbed energy, respectively, compared to the positive PR (PPR) structure. This highlights the great potential for FGHPR lattices to be used in protective devices, load-bearing medical implants, and energy-absorbing applications.</jats:p>"}],"keyword":["General Materials Science"],"date_created":"2022-06-27T14:50:27Z","issue":"12","publication_status":"published","doi":"10.3390/ma15124072","article_number":"4072"}