{"publication_identifier":{"issn":["0001-5970","1619-6937"]},"department":[{"_id":"630"}],"title":"Comparison of two mesh-moving techniques for finite element simulations of galvanic corrosion","_id":"34257","volume":233,"citation":{"apa":"Harzheim, S., Hofmann, M., & Wallmersperger, T. (2022). Comparison of two mesh-moving techniques for finite element simulations of galvanic corrosion. Acta Mechanica, 233(11), 4427–4439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z","ieee":"S. Harzheim, M. Hofmann, and T. Wallmersperger, “Comparison of two mesh-moving techniques for finite element simulations of galvanic corrosion,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 233, no. 11, pp. 4427–4439, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z.","mla":"Harzheim, Sven, et al. “Comparison of Two Mesh-Moving Techniques for Finite Element Simulations of Galvanic Corrosion.” Acta Mechanica, vol. 233, no. 11, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022, pp. 4427–39, doi:10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z.","ama":"Harzheim S, Hofmann M, Wallmersperger T. Comparison of two mesh-moving techniques for finite element simulations of galvanic corrosion. Acta Mechanica. 2022;233(11):4427-4439. doi:10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z","short":"S. Harzheim, M. Hofmann, T. Wallmersperger, Acta Mechanica 233 (2022) 4427–4439.","chicago":"Harzheim, Sven, Martin Hofmann, and Thomas Wallmersperger. “Comparison of Two Mesh-Moving Techniques for Finite Element Simulations of Galvanic Corrosion.” Acta Mechanica 233, no. 11 (2022): 4427–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z.","bibtex":"@article{Harzheim_Hofmann_Wallmersperger_2022, title={Comparison of two mesh-moving techniques for finite element simulations of galvanic corrosion}, volume={233}, DOI={10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z}, number={11}, journal={Acta Mechanica}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Harzheim, Sven and Hofmann, Martin and Wallmersperger, Thomas}, year={2022}, pages={4427–4439} }"},"user_id":"14931","intvolume":" 233","status":"public","year":"2022","publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","author":[{"first_name":"Sven","full_name":"Harzheim, Sven","last_name":"Harzheim"},{"first_name":"Martin","last_name":"Hofmann","full_name":"Hofmann, Martin"},{"first_name":"Thomas","full_name":"Wallmersperger, Thomas","last_name":"Wallmersperger"}],"publication":"Acta Mechanica","type":"journal_article","date_updated":"2023-01-02T11:07:28Z","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"main_file_link":[{"open_access":"1","url":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z"}],"keyword":["Mechanical Engineering","Computational Mechanics"],"date_created":"2022-12-06T20:47:16Z","project":[{"_id":"130","grant_number":"418701707","name":"TRR 285: TRR 285"},{"name":"TRR 285 – B03: TRR 285 - Subproject B03","_id":"142"}],"abstract":[{"text":"Galvanic corrosion is a destructive process between dissimilar metals. The present paper presents a constructed numerical test case to simulate galvanic corrosion of two dissimilar metals. This test case is used to study the accuracy of different implementations to track the dissolving anode boundary. One technique is to numerically simulate a mesh displacement based on the prescribed displacement at the anode boundary. The second method is to adjust only the boundary elements. Re-meshing after a certain number of time steps is applied to both implementations. They produce similar results for an electrical and electrochemical field problem. This work shows that mesh smoothing does not result in higher accuracy when modeling a moving anode front. Adjusting only the boundary elements is sufficient when frequent re-meshing is used.","lang":"eng"}],"oa":"1","doi":"10.1007/s00707-022-03326-z","page":"4427-4439","issue":"11","publication_status":"published"}