<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>A Validation Study for the German Versions of the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale for a Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercise</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Thorenz, Kristin</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Berwinkel, Andre</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Weigelt, Matthias</dc:creator>
   	<dc:subject>Behavioral Neuroscience</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>General Psychology</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Genetics</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Development</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Ecology</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Evolution</dc:subject>
   	<dc:subject>Behavior and Systematics</dc:subject>
   	<dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The aim of the present study is to prove the construct validity of the German versions of the Feeling Scale (FS) and the Felt Arousal Scale (FAS) for a progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) exercise. A total of 228 sport science students conducted the PMR exercise for 45 min and completed the FS, the FAS, and the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) in a pre-test–post-test design. A significant decrease in arousal (t(227) = 8.296, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and a significant increase in pleasure (t(227) = 4.748, p &amp;lt; 0.001) were observed. For convergent validity, the correlations between the FS and the subscale SAM-P for the valence dimension (r = 0.67, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and between the FAS and the subscale SAM-A for the arousal dimension (r = 0.31, p &amp;lt; 0.001) were significant. For discriminant validity, the correlations between different constructs (FS and SAM-A, FAS and SAM-P) were not significant, whereas the discriminant analysis between the FS and the FAS revealed a negative significant correlation (r = −0.15, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Together, the pattern of results confirms the use of the German versions of the FS and the FAS to measure the affective response for a PMR exercise.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>MDPI AG</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2023</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/45857</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Thorenz K, Berwinkel A, Weigelt M. A Validation Study for the German Versions of the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale for a Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercise. &lt;i&gt;Behavioral Sciences&lt;/i&gt;. 2023;13(7). doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070523&quot;&gt;10.3390/bs13070523&lt;/a&gt;</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/bs13070523</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2076-328X</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
