{"page":"778–786","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","status":"public","_id":"48850","user_id":"102979","year":"2020","citation":{"ama":"Bossek J, Doerr C, Kerschke P. Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. GECCO ’20. Association for Computing Machinery; 2020:778–786. doi:10.1145/3377930.3390155","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Bossek_Doerr_Kerschke_2020, place={New York, NY, USA}, series={GECCO ’20}, title={Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB}, DOI={10.1145/3377930.3390155}, booktitle={Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference}, publisher={Association for Computing Machinery}, author={Bossek, Jakob and Doerr, Carola and Kerschke, Pascal}, year={2020}, pages={778–786}, collection={GECCO ’20} }","ieee":"J. Bossek, C. Doerr, and P. Kerschke, “Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2020, pp. 778–786, doi: 10.1145/3377930.3390155.","short":"J. Bossek, C. Doerr, P. Kerschke, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp. 778–786.","apa":"Bossek, J., Doerr, C., & Kerschke, P. (2020). Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377930.3390155","mla":"Bossek, Jakob, et al. “Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB.” Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 778–786, doi:10.1145/3377930.3390155.","chicago":"Bossek, Jakob, Carola Doerr, and Pascal Kerschke. “Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB.” In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 778–786. GECCO ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377930.3390155."},"keyword":["continuous black-box optimization","design of experiments","initial design","sequential model-based optimization"],"type":"conference","publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery","series_title":"GECCO ’20","place":"New York, NY, USA","date_updated":"2023-12-13T10:44:01Z","title":"Initial Design Strategies and Their Effects on Sequential Model-Based Optimization: An Exploratory Case Study Based on BBOB","extern":"1","abstract":[{"text":"Sequential model-based optimization (SMBO) approaches are algorithms for solving problems that require computationally or otherwise expensive function evaluations. The key design principle of SMBO is a substitution of the true objective function by a surrogate, which is used to propose the point(s) to be evaluated next. SMBO algorithms are intrinsically modular, leaving the user with many important design choices. Significant research efforts go into understanding which settings perform best for which type of problems. Most works, however, focus on the choice of the model, the acquisition function, and the strategy used to optimize the latter. The choice of the initial sampling strategy, however, receives much less attention. Not surprisingly, quite diverging recommendations can be found in the literature. We analyze in this work how the size and the distribution of the initial sample influences the overall quality of the efficient global optimization (EGO) algorithm, a well-known SMBO approach. While, overall, small initial budgets using Halton sampling seem preferable, we also observe that the performance landscape is rather unstructured. We furthermore identify several situations in which EGO performs unfavorably against random sampling. Both observations indicate that an adaptive SMBO design could be beneficial, making SMBO an interesting test-bed for automated algorithm design.","lang":"eng"}],"publication_status":"published","date_created":"2023-11-14T15:58:53Z","doi":"10.1145/3377930.3390155","publication_identifier":{"isbn":["978-1-4503-7128-5"]},"author":[{"id":"102979","first_name":"Jakob","last_name":"Bossek","full_name":"Bossek, Jakob","orcid":"0000-0002-4121-4668"},{"first_name":"Carola","full_name":"Doerr, Carola","last_name":"Doerr"},{"full_name":"Kerschke, Pascal","last_name":"Kerschke","first_name":"Pascal"}],"department":[{"_id":"819"}]}