<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3">

<genre>book chapter</genre>

<titleInfo><title>Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms?</title></titleInfo>


<note type="publicationStatus">published</note>



<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Jakob</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Bossek</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role><identifier type="local">102979</identifier><description xsi:type="identifierDefinition" type="orcid">0000-0002-4121-4668</description></name>
<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Dirk</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Sudholt</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role></name>







<name type="corporate">
  <namePart></namePart>
  <identifier type="local">819</identifier>
  <role>
    <roleTerm type="text">department</roleTerm>
  </role>
</name>








<abstract lang="eng">Most runtime analyses of randomised search heuristics focus on the expected number of function evaluations to find a unique global optimum. We ask a fundamental question: if additional search points are declared optimal, or declared as desirable target points, do these additional optima speed up evolutionary algorithms? More formally, we analyse the expected hitting time of a target set OPT {$\cup$} S where S is a set of non-optimal search points and OPT is the set of optima and compare it to the expected hitting time of OPT. We show that the answer to our question depends on the number and placement of search points in S. For all black-box algorithms and all fitness functions we show that, if additional optima are placed randomly, even an exponential number of optima has a negligible effect on the expected optimisation time. Considering Hamming balls around all global optima gives an easier target for some algorithms and functions and can shift the phase transition with respect to offspring population sizes in the (1,{$\lambda$}) EA on One-Max. Finally, on functions where search trajectories typically join in a single search point, turning one search point into an optimum drastically reduces the expected optimisation time.</abstract>

<originInfo><publisher>Association for Computing Machinery</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2021</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</language>

<subject><topic>evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>pseudo-boolean functions</topic><topic>runtime analysis</topic><topic>theory</topic>
</subject>


<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms</title></titleInfo>
  <identifier type="isbn">978-1-4503-8352-3</identifier>
<part><extent unit="pages">1–11</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>

<note type="extern">yes</note>
<extension>
<bibliographicCitation>
<ama>Bossek J, Sudholt D. Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms? In: &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms&lt;/i&gt;. Association for Computing Machinery; 2021:1–11.</ama>
<ieee>J. Bossek and D. Sudholt, “Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms?,” in &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms&lt;/i&gt;, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 1–11.</ieee>
<chicago>Bossek, Jakob, and Dirk Sudholt. “Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms?” In &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms&lt;/i&gt;, 1–11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021.</chicago>
<apa>Bossek, J., &amp;#38; Sudholt, D. (2021). Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms? In &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms&lt;/i&gt; (pp. 1–11). Association for Computing Machinery.</apa>
<bibtex>@inbook{Bossek_Sudholt_2021, place={New York, NY, USA}, title={Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms?}, booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms}, publisher={Association for Computing Machinery}, author={Bossek, Jakob and Sudholt, Dirk}, year={2021}, pages={1–11} }</bibtex>
<mla>Bossek, Jakob, and Dirk Sudholt. “Do Additional Optima Speed up Evolutionary Algorithms?” &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms&lt;/i&gt;, Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 1–11.</mla>
<short>J. Bossek, D. Sudholt, in: Proceedings of the 16th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 1–11.</short>
</bibliographicCitation>
</extension>
<recordInfo><recordIdentifier>48862</recordIdentifier><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-11-14T15:58:55Z</recordCreationDate><recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-13T10:45:31Z</recordChangeDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
