<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Rudolph, Dorian</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Gharibian, Sevag</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Nagaj, Daniel</dc:creator>
   	<dc:description>Despite the fundamental role the Quantum Satisfiability (QSAT) problem has
played in quantum complexity theory, a central question remains open: At which
local dimension does the complexity of QSAT transition from &quot;easy&quot; to &quot;hard&quot;?
Here, we study QSAT with each constraint acting on a $k$-dimensional and
$l$-dimensional qudit pair, denoted $(k,l)$-QSAT. Our first main result shows
that, surprisingly, QSAT on qubits can remain $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-hard, in that
$(2,5)$-QSAT is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete. In contrast, $2$-SAT on qubits is
well-known to be poly-time solvable [Bravyi, 2006]. Our second main result
proves that $(3,d)$-QSAT on the 1D line with $d\in O(1)$ is also
$\mathsf{QMA}_1$-hard. Finally, we initiate the study of 1D $(2,d)$-QSAT by
giving a frustration-free 1D Hamiltonian with a unique, entangled ground state.
  Our first result uses a direct embedding, combining a novel clock
construction with the 2D circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction of [Gosset, Nagaj,
2013]. Of note is a new simplified and analytic proof for the latter (as
opposed to a partially numeric proof in [GN13]). This exploits Unitary Labelled
Graphs [Bausch, Cubitt, Ozols, 2017] together with a new &quot;Nullspace Connection
Lemma&quot;, allowing us to break low energy analyses into small patches of
projectors, and to improve the soundness analysis of [GN13] from
$\Omega(1/T^6)$ to $\Omega(1/T^2)$, for $T$ the number of gates. Our second
result goes via black-box reduction: Given an arbitrary 1D Hamiltonian $H$ on
$d&apos;$-dimensional qudits, we show how to embed it into an effective null-space
of a 1D $(3,d)$-QSAT instance, for $d\in O(1)$. Our approach may be viewed as a
weaker notion of &quot;simulation&quot; (\`a la [Bravyi, Hastings 2017], [Cubitt,
Montanaro, Piddock 2018]). As far as we are aware, this gives the first
&quot;black-box simulation&quot;-based $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-hardness result, i.e. for
frustration-free Hamiltonians.</dc:description>
   	<dc:date>2025</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:conferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/50272</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Rudolph D, Gharibian S, Nagaj D. Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation. In: &lt;i&gt;16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)&lt;/i&gt;. Vol 325. ; 2025:1-24. doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/2401.02368</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
