<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3">

<genre>conference paper</genre>

<titleInfo><title>Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation</title></titleInfo>


<note type="publicationStatus">published</note>



<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Dorian</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Rudolph</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role></name>
<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Sevag</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Gharibian</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role><identifier type="local">71541</identifier><description xsi:type="identifierDefinition" type="orcid">0000-0002-9992-3379</description></name>
<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Nagaj</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role></name>














<abstract lang="eng">Despite the fundamental role the Quantum Satisfiability (QSAT) problem has
played in quantum complexity theory, a central question remains open: At which
local dimension does the complexity of QSAT transition from &quot;easy&quot; to &quot;hard&quot;?
Here, we study QSAT with each constraint acting on a $k$-dimensional and
$l$-dimensional qudit pair, denoted $(k,l)$-QSAT. Our first main result shows
that, surprisingly, QSAT on qubits can remain $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-hard, in that
$(2,5)$-QSAT is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete. In contrast, $2$-SAT on qubits is
well-known to be poly-time solvable [Bravyi, 2006]. Our second main result
proves that $(3,d)$-QSAT on the 1D line with $d\in O(1)$ is also
$\mathsf{QMA}_1$-hard. Finally, we initiate the study of 1D $(2,d)$-QSAT by
giving a frustration-free 1D Hamiltonian with a unique, entangled ground state.
  Our first result uses a direct embedding, combining a novel clock
construction with the 2D circuit-to-Hamiltonian construction of [Gosset, Nagaj,
2013]. Of note is a new simplified and analytic proof for the latter (as
opposed to a partially numeric proof in [GN13]). This exploits Unitary Labelled
Graphs [Bausch, Cubitt, Ozols, 2017] together with a new &quot;Nullspace Connection
Lemma&quot;, allowing us to break low energy analyses into small patches of
projectors, and to improve the soundness analysis of [GN13] from
$\Omega(1/T^6)$ to $\Omega(1/T^2)$, for $T$ the number of gates. Our second
result goes via black-box reduction: Given an arbitrary 1D Hamiltonian $H$ on
$d&apos;$-dimensional qudits, we show how to embed it into an effective null-space
of a 1D $(3,d)$-QSAT instance, for $d\in O(1)$. Our approach may be viewed as a
weaker notion of &quot;simulation&quot; (\`a la [Bravyi, Hastings 2017], [Cubitt,
Montanaro, Piddock 2018]). As far as we are aware, this gives the first
&quot;black-box simulation&quot;-based $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-hardness result, i.e. for
frustration-free Hamiltonians.</abstract>

<originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2025</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</language>



<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)</title></titleInfo>
  <identifier type="arXiv">2401.02368</identifier><identifier type="doi">10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85</identifier>
<part><detail type="volume"><number>325</number></detail><detail type="issue"><number>85</number></detail><extent unit="pages">1-24</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>


<extension>
<bibliographicCitation>
<ama>Rudolph D, Gharibian S, Nagaj D. Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation. In: &lt;i&gt;16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)&lt;/i&gt;. Vol 325. ; 2025:1-24. doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;</ama>
<chicago>Rudolph, Dorian, Sevag Gharibian, and Daniel Nagaj. “Quantum 2-SAT on Low Dimensional Systems Is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-Complete:  Direct Embeddings and Black-Box Simulation.” In &lt;i&gt;16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)&lt;/i&gt;, 325:1–24, 2025. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;.</chicago>
<ieee>D. Rudolph, S. Gharibian, and D. Nagaj, “Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation,” in &lt;i&gt;16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)&lt;/i&gt;, 2025, vol. 325, no. 85, pp. 1–24, doi: &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;.</ieee>
<mla>Rudolph, Dorian, et al. “Quantum 2-SAT on Low Dimensional Systems Is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-Complete:  Direct Embeddings and Black-Box Simulation.” &lt;i&gt;16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)&lt;/i&gt;, vol. 325, no. 85, 2025, pp. 1–24, doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;.</mla>
<bibtex>@inproceedings{Rudolph_Gharibian_Nagaj_2025, title={Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation}, volume={325}, DOI={&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;}, number={85}, booktitle={16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)}, author={Rudolph, Dorian and Gharibian, Sevag and Nagaj, Daniel}, year={2025}, pages={1–24} }</bibtex>
<short>D. Rudolph, S. Gharibian, D. Nagaj, in: 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS), 2025, pp. 1–24.</short>
<apa>Rudolph, D., Gharibian, S., &amp;#38; Nagaj, D. (2025). Quantum 2-SAT on low dimensional systems is $\mathsf{QMA}_1$-complete:  Direct embeddings and black-box simulation. &lt;i&gt;16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;325&lt;/i&gt;(85), 1–24. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.85&lt;/a&gt;</apa>
</bibliographicCitation>
</extension>
<recordInfo><recordIdentifier>50272</recordIdentifier><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2024-01-07T20:09:13Z</recordCreationDate><recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2025-02-11T07:21:23Z</recordChangeDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
