{"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","type":"journal_article","date_updated":"2024-05-04T15:57:35Z","author":[{"full_name":"Vafadarnikjoo, Amin","last_name":"Vafadarnikjoo","first_name":"Amin"},{"full_name":"Tavana, Madjid","last_name":"Tavana","first_name":"Madjid","id":"31858"},{"full_name":"Botelho, Tiago","first_name":"Tiago","last_name":"Botelho"},{"last_name":"Chalvatzis","first_name":"Konstantinos","full_name":"Chalvatzis, Konstantinos"}],"citation":{"chicago":"Vafadarnikjoo, Amin, Madjid Tavana, Tiago Botelho, and Konstantinos Chalvatzis. “A Neutrosophic Enhanced Best–Worst Method for Considering Decision-Makers’ Confidence in the Best and Worst Criteria.” <i>Annals of Operations Research</i> 289, no. 2 (2020): 391–418. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x\">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x</a>.","bibtex":"@article{Vafadarnikjoo_Tavana_Botelho_Chalvatzis_2020, title={A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria}, volume={289}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x\">10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x</a>}, number={2}, journal={Annals of Operations Research}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Vafadarnikjoo, Amin and Tavana, Madjid and Botelho, Tiago and Chalvatzis, Konstantinos}, year={2020}, pages={391–418} }","short":"A. Vafadarnikjoo, M. Tavana, T. Botelho, K. Chalvatzis, Annals of Operations Research 289 (2020) 391–418.","apa":"Vafadarnikjoo, A., Tavana, M., Botelho, T., &#38; Chalvatzis, K. (2020). A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria. <i>Annals of Operations Research</i>, <i>289</i>(2), 391–418. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x\">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x</a>","ama":"Vafadarnikjoo A, Tavana M, Botelho T, Chalvatzis K. A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria. <i>Annals of Operations Research</i>. 2020;289(2):391-418. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x\">10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x</a>","ieee":"A. Vafadarnikjoo, M. Tavana, T. Botelho, and K. Chalvatzis, “A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria,” <i>Annals of Operations Research</i>, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 391–418, 2020, doi: <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x\">10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x</a>.","mla":"Vafadarnikjoo, Amin, et al. “A Neutrosophic Enhanced Best–Worst Method for Considering Decision-Makers’ Confidence in the Best and Worst Criteria.” <i>Annals of Operations Research</i>, vol. 289, no. 2, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020, pp. 391–418, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x\">10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x</a>."},"title":"A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria","issue":"2","volume":289,"status":"public","date_created":"2024-05-04T15:35:56Z","_id":"53888","intvolume":"       289","doi":"10.1007/s10479-020-03603-x","publication":"Annals of Operations Research","year":"2020","page":"391-418","user_id":"51811","publication_identifier":{"issn":["0254-5330","1572-9338"]},"publication_status":"published","department":[{"_id":"277"}]}