{"doi":"10.3233/faia240867","date_created":"2024-11-19T11:46:55Z","publisher":"IOS Press","publication":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications","department":[{"_id":"574"}],"conference":{"name":"ECAI} 2024 - 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence","location":"Santiago de Compostela, Spain"},"user_id":"99353","title":"Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance?","citation":{"ama":"Fichte JK, Hecher M, Mahmood Y, Meier A. Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance? In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press; 2024. doi:10.3233/faia240867","ieee":"J. K. Fichte, M. Hecher, Y. Mahmood, and A. Meier, “Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance?,” in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, 2024.","apa":"Fichte, J. K., Hecher, M., Mahmood, Y., & Meier, A. (2024). Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance? In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. ECAI} 2024 - 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/faia240867","short":"J.K. Fichte, M. Hecher, Y. Mahmood, A. Meier, in: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, 2024.","mla":"Fichte, Johannes K., et al. “Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance?” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, 2024, doi:10.3233/faia240867.","bibtex":"@inbook{Fichte_Hecher_Mahmood_Meier_2024, title={Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance?}, DOI={10.3233/faia240867}, booktitle={Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, publisher={IOS Press}, author={Fichte, Johannes K. and Hecher, Markus and Mahmood, Yasir and Meier, Arne}, year={2024} }","chicago":"Fichte, Johannes K., Markus Hecher, Yasir Mahmood, and Arne Meier. “Rejection in Abstract Argumentation: Harder Than Acceptance?” In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3233/faia240867."},"author":[{"first_name":"Johannes K.","last_name":"Fichte","full_name":"Fichte, Johannes K."},{"full_name":"Hecher, Markus","last_name":"Hecher","first_name":"Markus"},{"full_name":"Mahmood, Yasir","last_name":"Mahmood","first_name":"Yasir","id":"99353"},{"first_name":"Arne","last_name":"Meier","full_name":"Meier, Arne"}],"publication_status":"published","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication_identifier":{"issn":["0922-6389","1879-8314"],"isbn":["9781643685489"]},"date_updated":"2024-11-19T11:48:20Z","status":"public","year":"2024","abstract":[{"text":"Abstract argumentation is a popular toolkit for modeling, evaluating, and comparing arguments. Relationships between arguments are specified in argumentation frameworks (AFs), and conditions are placed on sets (extensions) of arguments that allow AFs to be evaluated. For more expressiveness, AFs are augmented with acceptance conditions on directly interacting arguments or a constraint on the admissible sets of arguments, resulting in dialectic frameworks or constrained argumentation frameworks. In this paper, we consider flexible conditions for rejecting an argument from an extension, which we call rejection conditions (RCs). On the technical level, we associate each argument with a specific logic program. We analyze the resulting complexity, including the structural parameter treewidth. Rejection AFs are highly expressive, giving rise to natural problems on higher levels of the polynomial hierarchy.","lang":"eng"}],"_id":"57238","type":"book_chapter"}