conference abstract J. Pieczewski author C. Nettekoven author V. Neuschmelting author K. Thiele author C. Grefkes author R. Goldbrunner author C. Weiss Lucas author 890 department 2017 eng 1388245710.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345 1283e126-e127 yes Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K., Grefkes, C., Goldbrunner, R., &#38; Weiss Lucas, C. (2017). P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, <i>128</i>(3), e126–e127. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345</a> J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, C. Weiss Lucas, in: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, pp. e126–e127. @inproceedings{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_Grefkes_Goldbrunner_Weiss Lucas_2017, title={P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers}, volume={128}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345</a>}, number={3}, booktitle={Clinical Neurophysiology}, author={Pieczewski, J. and Nettekoven, C. and Neuschmelting, V. and Thiele, K. and Grefkes, C. and Goldbrunner, R. and Weiss Lucas, C.}, year={2017}, pages={e126–e127} } Pieczewski, J., et al. “P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, vol. 128, no. 3, 2017, pp. e126–27, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345</a>. J. Pieczewski <i>et al.</i>, “P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers,” in <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, 2017, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. e126–e127, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345</a>. Pieczewski, J., C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, and C. Weiss Lucas. “P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” In <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, 128:e126–27, 2017. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345</a>. Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, et al. P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. In: <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>. Vol 128. ; 2017:e126-e127. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345</a> 579682025-01-06T12:11:43Z2026-04-13T11:33:31Z