conference abstract J. Pieczewski author C. Nettekoven author V. Neuschmelting author Kristina Thiele author 945400000-0002-1067-9139 C. Grefkes author R. Goldbrunner author C. Weiss Lucas author 890 department 2016 eng 1388245710.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 1279e266 yes Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K., Grefkes, C., Goldbrunner, R., &#38; Lucas, C. W. (2016). EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, <i>127</i>(9), e266. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117</a> @inproceedings{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_Grefkes_Goldbrunner_Lucas_2016, title={EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers}, volume={127}, DOI={<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117</a>}, number={9}, booktitle={Clinical Neurophysiology}, author={Pieczewski, J. and Nettekoven, C. and Neuschmelting, V. and Thiele, Kristina and Grefkes, C. and Goldbrunner, R. and Lucas, C. Weiss}, year={2016}, pages={e266} } Pieczewski, J., et al. “EP 66. Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, vol. 127, no. 9, 2016, p. e266, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117</a>. J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, C.W. Lucas, in: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016, p. e266. Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, et al. EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. In: <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>. Vol 127. ; 2016:e266. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117</a> Pieczewski, J., C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, Kristina Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, and C. Weiss Lucas. “EP 66. Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” In <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, 127:e266, 2016. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117</a>. J. Pieczewski <i>et al.</i>, “EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers,” in <i>Clinical Neurophysiology</i>, 2016, vol. 127, no. 9, p. e266, doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117">10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117</a>. 579702025-01-06T12:11:43Z2026-04-20T11:05:14Z