{"_id":"59504","date_updated":"2025-04-10T14:39:50Z","type":"journal_article","issue":"2","author":[{"first_name":"Olivier","last_name":"Cots","full_name":"Cots, Olivier"},{"full_name":"Gergaud, Joseph","last_name":"Gergaud","first_name":"Joseph"},{"first_name":"Damien","last_name":"Goubinat","full_name":"Goubinat, Damien"},{"full_name":"Wembe, Boris","last_name":"Wembe","first_name":"Boris"}],"date_created":"2025-04-10T14:34:18Z","page":"817-839","intvolume":" 57","status":"public","publication_identifier":{"issn":["2822-7840","2804-7214"]},"abstract":[{"text":"In this article, we are interested in optimal aircraft trajectories in climbing phase. We consider the cost index criterion which is a convex combination of the time-to-climb and the fuel consumption. We assume that the thrust is constant and we control the flight path angle of the aircraft. This optimization problem is modeled as a Mayer optimal control problem with a single-input affine dynamics in the control and with two pure state constraints, limiting the Calibrated AirSpeed (CAS) and the Mach speed. The candidates as minimizers are selected among a set of extremals given by the maximum principle. We first analyze the minimum time-to-climb problem with respect to the bounds of the state constraints, combining small time analysis, indirect multiple shooting and homotopy methods with monitoring. This investigation emphasizes two strategies: the common CAS/Mach procedure in aeronautics and the classical Bang-Singular-Bang policy in control theory. We then compare these two procedures for the cost index criterion.","lang":"eng"}],"publisher":"EDP Sciences","year":"2022","doi":"10.1051/m2an/2022101","publication":"ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis","volume":57,"title":"Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase","publication_status":"published","citation":{"mla":"Cots, Olivier, et al. “Singular versus Boundary Arcs for Aircraft Trajectory Optimization in Climbing Phase.” ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol. 57, no. 2, EDP Sciences, 2022, pp. 817–39, doi:10.1051/m2an/2022101.","ieee":"O. Cots, J. Gergaud, D. Goubinat, and B. Wembe, “Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase,” ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 817–839, 2022, doi: 10.1051/m2an/2022101.","ama":"Cots O, Gergaud J, Goubinat D, Wembe B. Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis. 2022;57(2):817-839. doi:10.1051/m2an/2022101","apa":"Cots, O., Gergaud, J., Goubinat, D., & Wembe, B. (2022). Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 57(2), 817–839. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2022101","chicago":"Cots, Olivier, Joseph Gergaud, Damien Goubinat, and Boris Wembe. “Singular versus Boundary Arcs for Aircraft Trajectory Optimization in Climbing Phase.” ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 57, no. 2 (2022): 817–39. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2022101.","short":"O. Cots, J. Gergaud, D. Goubinat, B. Wembe, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 57 (2022) 817–839.","bibtex":"@article{Cots_Gergaud_Goubinat_Wembe_2022, title={Singular versus boundary arcs for aircraft trajectory optimization in climbing phase}, volume={57}, DOI={10.1051/m2an/2022101}, number={2}, journal={ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis}, publisher={EDP Sciences}, author={Cots, Olivier and Gergaud, Joseph and Goubinat, Damien and Wembe, Boris}, year={2022}, pages={817–839} }"},"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"user_id":"95394"}