---
res:
  bibo_abstract:
  - If one of two events is attended to, it will be perceived earlier than a simultaneously
    occurring unattended event. Since 150 years, this effect has been ascribed to
    the facilitating influence of attention, also known as prior entry. Yet, the attentional
    origin of prior-entry effects¹ has been repeatedly doubted. One criticism is that
    prior-entry effects might be due to biased decision processes that would mimic
    a temporal advantage for attended stimuli. Although most obvious biases have already
    been excluded experimentally (e.g. judgment criteria, response compatibility)
    and prior-entry effects have shown to persist (Shore, Spence, & Klein, 2001),
    many other biases are conceivable, which makes it difficult to put the debate
    to an end. Thus, we approach this problem the other way around by asking whether
    prior-entry effects can be biased voluntarily. Observers were informed about prior
    entry and instructed to reduce it as far as possible. For this aim they received
    continuous feedback@eng
  bibo_authorlist:
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Katharina
      foaf_name: Weiß, Katharina
      foaf_surname: Weiß
  - foaf_Person:
      foaf_givenName: Ingrid
      foaf_name: Scharlau, Ingrid
      foaf_surname: Scharlau
      foaf_workInfoHomepage: http://www.librecat.org/personId=451
    orcid: 0000-0003-2364-9489
  bibo_issue: '1'
  bibo_volume: 139
  dct_date: 2012^xs_gYear
  dct_isPartOf:
  - http://id.crossref.org/issn/0001-6918
  dct_language: eng
  dct_subject:
  - intentions
  - events
  - attention
  - decision processes
  - Adult
  - Attention
  - Choice Behavior
  - Cues
  - Female
  - Humans
  - Intention
  - Judgment
  - Male
  - Middle Aged
  - Reaction Time
  - Time Perception
  - Visual Perception
  - Attention
  - Decision Making
  - Experiences (Events)
  - Intention
  dct_title: 'At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes
    is not susceptible to current intentions.@'
...