{"date_created":"2025-07-26T02:09:23Z","department":[{"_id":"890"}],"_id":"60755","editor":[{"last_name":"Pieczewski","full_name":"Pieczewski, J","first_name":"J"},{"first_name":"C","last_name":"Nettekoven","full_name":"Nettekoven, C"},{"full_name":"Neuschmelting, V","last_name":"Neuschmelting","first_name":"V"},{"last_name":"Thiele","full_name":"Thiele, K","first_name":"K"},{"last_name":" Grefkes","full_name":" Grefkes, C","first_name":"C"},{"first_name":"R","last_name":"Goldbrunner","full_name":"Goldbrunner, R"},{"first_name":"C.W","full_name":"Lucas, C.W","last_name":"Lucas"}],"series_title":" Clinical Neurophysiology","publication_status":"published","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"type":"conference_editor","year":"2016","doi":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 ","volume":127,"page":"e266","issue":"9","title":"EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent  stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability  study in healthy volunteers","user_id":"71124","citation":{"ieee":"J. Pieczewski <i>et al.</i>, Eds., <i>EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent  stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability  study in healthy volunteers</i>, vol. 127, no. 9. 2016, p. e266.","ama":"Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, et al., eds. <i>EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent  Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability  Study in Healthy Volunteers</i>. Vol 127.; 2016:e266. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 \">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 </a>","bibtex":"@book{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_ Grefkes_Goldbrunner_Lucas_2016, series={ Clinical Neurophysiology}, title={EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent  stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability  study in healthy volunteers}, volume={127}, DOI={<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 \">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 </a>}, number={9}, year={2016}, pages={e266}, collection={ Clinical Neurophysiology} }","mla":"Pieczewski, J., et al., editors. <i>EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent  Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability  Study in Healthy Volunteers</i>. no. 9, 2016, p. e266, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 \">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 </a>.","chicago":"Pieczewski, J, C Nettekoven, V Neuschmelting, K Thiele, C  Grefkes, R Goldbrunner, and C.W Lucas, eds. <i>EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent  Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability  Study in Healthy Volunteers</i>. Vol. 127.  Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 \">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 </a>.","short":"J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C.  Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, C.W. Lucas, eds., EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent  Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability  Study in Healthy Volunteers, 2016.","apa":"Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K.,  Grefkes, C., Goldbrunner, R., &#38; Lucas, C. W. (Eds.). (2016). <i>EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent  stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability  study in healthy volunteers</i> (Vol. 127, Issue 9, p. e266). <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 \">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 </a>"},"date_updated":"2025-07-28T23:27:06Z","status":"public","intvolume":"       127"}