{"user_id":"42165","date_created":"2018-12-10T07:05:19Z","main_file_link":[{"url":"https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/psychologie/Kognitive_Psychologie/Publikationen/HorstmannScharlauAnsorge.pdf","open_access":"1"}],"citation":{"ama":"Horstmann G, Scharlau I, Ansorge U. More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>. 2006;13(6):1067-1073.","bibtex":"@article{Horstmann_Scharlau_Ansorge_2006, title={More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.}, volume={13}, number={6}, journal={Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review}, author={Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich}, year={2006}, pages={1067–1073} }","ieee":"G. Horstmann, I. Scharlau, and U. Ansorge, “More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.,” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1067–1073, 2006.","mla":"Horstmann, Gernot, et al. “More Efficient Rejection of Happy than of Angry Face Distractors in Visual Search.” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>, vol. 13, no. 6, 2006, pp. 1067–73.","chicago":"Horstmann, Gernot, Ingrid Scharlau, and Ulrich Ansorge. “More Efficient Rejection of Happy than of Angry Face Distractors in Visual Search.” <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i> 13, no. 6 (2006): 1067–73.","apa":"Horstmann, G., Scharlau, I., &#38; Ansorge, U. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review</i>, <i>13</i>(6), 1067–1073.","short":"G. Horstmann, I. Scharlau, U. Ansorge, Psychonomic Bulletin &#38; Review 13 (2006) 1067–1073."},"oa":"1","issue":"6","type":"journal_article","status":"public","publication_identifier":{"issn":["1069-9384"]},"keyword":["angry face distractors","visual search","negative face distractors","Adult","Anger","Attention","Face","Female","Happiness","Humans","Male","Rejection (Psychology)","Visual Perception","Distraction","Face Perception","Visual Perception","Visual Search"],"page":"1067 - 1073","year":"2006","extern":"1","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"intvolume":"        13","_id":"6076","department":[{"_id":"424"}],"volume":13,"author":[{"last_name":"Horstmann","first_name":"Gernot","full_name":"Horstmann, Gernot"},{"full_name":"Scharlau, Ingrid","orcid":"0000-0003-2364-9489","first_name":"Ingrid","id":"451","last_name":"Scharlau"},{"full_name":"Ansorge, Ulrich","first_name":"Ulrich","last_name":"Ansorge"}],"date_updated":"2022-06-07T00:23:43Z","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"In the present study, we examined whether the detection advantage for negative-face targets in crowds of positive-face distractors over positive-face targets in crowds of negative faces can be explained by differentially efficient distractor rejection. Search Condition A demonstrated more efficient distractor rejection with negative-face targets in positive-face crowds than vice versa. Search Condition B showed that target identity alone is not sufficient to account for this effect, because there was no difference in processing efficiency for positive- and negative-face targets within neutral crowds. Search Condition C showed differentially efficient processing with neutral-face targets among positive- or negative-face distractors. These results were obtained with both a within-participants (Experiment 1) and a between-participants (Experiment 2) design. The pattern of results is consistent with the assumption that efficient rejection of positive (more homogenous) distractors is an im"}],"title":"More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.","publication_status":"published","publication":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review"}