{"status":"public","intvolume":"        64","date_created":"2018-12-10T07:06:56Z","page":"394 - 416","author":[{"last_name":"Weiß","first_name":"Katharina","full_name":"Weiß, Katharina"},{"id":"451","orcid":"0000-0003-2364-9489","full_name":"Scharlau, Ingrid","last_name":"Scharlau","first_name":"Ingrid"}],"main_file_link":[{"open_access":"1","url":"https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/psychologie/Kognitive_Psychologie/Publikationen/WeissScharlau2010.pdf"}],"abstract":[{"text":"Attended stimuli are perceived as occurring earlier than unattended stimuli. This phenomenon of prior entry is usually identified by a shift in the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) in temporal order judgements (TOJs). According to its traditional psychophysical interpretation, the PSS coincides with the perception of simultaneity. This assumption is, however, questionable. Technically, the PSS represents the temporal interval between two stimuli at which the two alternative TOJs are equally likely. Thus it also seems possible that observers perceive not simultaneity, but uncertainty of temporal order. This possibility is supported by prior-entry studies, which find that perception of simultaneity is not very likely at the PSS. The present study tested the percept at the PSS in prior entry, using peripheral cues to orient attention. We found that manipulating attention caused varying temporal perceptions around the PSS. On some occasions observers perceived the two stimuli as sim","lang":"eng"}],"publication_identifier":{"issn":["1747-0218"]},"keyword":["temporal order perception","simultaneity","temporal order judgment","attention","visual perception","Adolescent","Adult","Attention","Cues","Discrimination (Psychology)","Female","Humans","Judgment","Male","Models","Psychological","Photic Stimulation","Reaction Time","Time Factors","Uncertainty","Visual Perception","Young Adult","Attention","Judgment","Stimulus Similarity","Time Perception","Visual Discrimination","Temporal Order (Judgment)"],"date_updated":"2022-06-07T00:17:26Z","oa":"1","_id":"6084","funded_apc":"1","issue":"2","type":"journal_article","citation":{"chicago":"Weiß, Katharina, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Simultaneity and Temporal Order Perception: Different Sides of the Same Coin? Evidence from a Visual Prior-Entry Study.” <i>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i> 64, no. 2 (2011): 394–416.","apa":"Weiß, K., &#38; Scharlau, I. (2011). Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study. <i>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>, <i>64</i>(2), 394–416.","short":"K. Weiß, I. Scharlau, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2011) 394–416.","bibtex":"@article{Weiß_Scharlau_2011, title={Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.}, volume={64}, number={2}, journal={The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology}, author={Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}, year={2011}, pages={394–416} }","ama":"Weiß K, Scharlau I. Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study. <i>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>. 2011;64(2):394-416.","ieee":"K. Weiß and I. Scharlau, “Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.,” <i>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 394–416, 2011.","mla":"Weiß, Katharina, and Ingrid Scharlau. “Simultaneity and Temporal Order Perception: Different Sides of the Same Coin? Evidence from a Visual Prior-Entry Study.” <i>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</i>, vol. 64, no. 2, 2011, pp. 394–416."},"publication_status":"published","department":[{"_id":"424"}],"user_id":"42165","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","year":"2011","title":"Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study.","volume":64}