<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Domain-wall/metal-electrode injection barrier in lithium niobate: Fowler-Nordheim tunneling fits best</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Zahn, Manuel</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Beyreuther, Elke</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Kiseleva, Iuliia</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Ratzenberger, Julius</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Rüsing, Michael</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Eng, Lukas M.</dc:creator>
   	<dc:description>The comprehensive description of both the electrical transport along conductive domain walls in lithium niobate single crystals and the charge injection at the interfacing metal electrodes, emerged to be a complex challenge. Recently, a heuristic evaluation allowed to postulate the “𝑅⁢2⁢𝐷⁢2
” equivalent-circuit model (consisting of two parallel resistor-diode pairs) to appropriately match the dc current-voltage (I-V) characteristics. Here, we carefully revisit the interfacial electrical behavior, i.e., the diode part of the equivalent circuit model, since many more processes beyond the diode-related electron hopping transport (HT) assumed so far, may concurrently occur, such as thermionic emission (TE), Fowler-Nordheim tunneling (FNT), space-charge limited conduction (SCLC), and others. The “𝑅⁢2⁢𝐷⁢2
” model thus needs to be generalized into an “𝑅⁢2⁢𝑋⁢2
” circuit model (with 𝑋
= HT, TE, FNT, SCLC, and others) to fit to the experimental data. Moreover, to check for the best I-V curve fitting to the different theories, we apply a higher-harmonic DW current-contribution analysis, i.e., an ac I-V inspection, that allows us to discriminate between all these possible models with much higher precision than from pure dc I-V curve fitting. Both the ac and dc analysis yield consistent results, finding that the FNT model accounts best for the domain-wall/electrode junctions investigated here.</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>American Physical Society (APS)</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2026</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/66944</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Zahn M, Beyreuther E, Kiseleva I, Ratzenberger J, Rüsing M, Eng LM. Domain-wall/metal-electrode injection barrier in lithium niobate: Fowler-Nordheim tunneling fits best. &lt;i&gt;Physical Review B&lt;/i&gt;. 2026;114(4). doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1103/3q26-4c3g&quot;&gt;10.1103/3q26-4c3g&lt;/a&gt;</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1103/3q26-4c3g</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2469-9950</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2469-9969</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
