<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Verification Complexity and Extension of Classical Shadows</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Karaiskos, Georgios</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Raza, Asad</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Rudolph, Dorian</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Koh, Dax Enshan</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Gharibian, Sevag</dc:creator>
   	<dc:description>Classical shadows are an influential framework for compressing copies of a given quantum state $ρ$ into classical data $S$, enabling many properties of $ρ$ to be predicted from relatively few copies. In this work, we study two natural questions involving shadows: (1) Given $S$, when can one efficiently verify that $S$ came from a genuine $n$-qubit state? This is called the Classical Shadow Validity (CSV) problem, introduced by Karaiskos, Rudolph, Meyer, Eisert, and Gharibian [ICALP 2026]. (2) Given $S$ that allows one to capture 2-local properties of $ρ$, can one fake or spoof a shadow $S&apos;$ which predicts 3-local properties of some state? For (1), we show CSV is efficiently solvable for permutation-invariant shadows, QMA-hard for real, fermionic, and bosonic shadows, and both coNP-hard and QMA-hard when the observable family consists of all $n$-qubit Pauli strings. A result of independent interest along the way is a new upper bound qc-$Σ_2$ $\subseteq$ $\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{PP}}$, where qc-$Σ_2$ is a quantum analogue of the second level of the polynomial hierarchy in which the first proof is quantum. For (2), we show intractability: Given the 2-local marginals $S$ of a quantum state $ρ$, estimating the 3-local marginals of $ρ$ is intractable unless QCMA $\subseteq$ BPP, even if the state $ρ$ is the unique state consistent with $S$.</dc:description>
   	<dc:date>2026</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:preprint</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_816b</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/67292</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Karaiskos G, Raza A, Rudolph D, Koh DE, Gharibian S. Verification Complexity and Extension of Classical Shadows. &lt;i&gt;arXiv:260940107&lt;/i&gt;. Published online 2026.</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/2609.40107</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
