Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted
V. Peckhaus, History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.) 25 (2004) 3–14.
Journal Article
| English
Author
Abstract
Rezension: Zbl. Math. 1100.03006; MR 2055237 (2005:03004; J.W. Dauben).
Publishing Year
Journal Title
History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.)
Volume
25
Page
3-14
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Peckhaus V. Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted. History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, hg v John W Dawson, Jr). 2004;25:3-14.
Peckhaus, V. (2004). Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted. History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.), 25, 3–14.
@article{Peckhaus_2004, title={Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted}, volume={25}, journal={History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.)}, author={Peckhaus, Volker}, year={2004}, pages={3–14} }
Peckhaus, Volker. “Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted.” History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.) 25 (2004): 3–14.
V. Peckhaus, “Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted,” History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.), vol. 25, pp. 3–14, 2004.
Peckhaus, Volker. “Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisted.” History and Philosophy of Logic (Special Issue in Honor of Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Hg. v. John W. Dawson, Jr.), vol. 25, 2004, pp. 3–14.
All files available under the following license(s):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Link(s) to Main File(s)
Access Level
Closed Access
Google Scholar