Faster, harder, greener? Empirical evidence on the role of the individual Pace of Life for productivity and pro-environmental behavior
C. Hoffmann, J.A. Hoppe, N. Ziemann, Ecological Economics 191 (2021).
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Journal Article
| Published
| English
Author
Hoffmann, Christin;
Hoppe, Julia AmelieLibreCat;
Ziemann, Niklas
Publishing Year
Journal Title
Ecological Economics
Volume
191
Article Number
107212
ISSN
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Hoffmann C, Hoppe JA, Ziemann N. Faster, harder, greener? Empirical evidence on the role of the individual Pace of Life for productivity and pro-environmental behavior. Ecological Economics. 2021;191. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212
Hoffmann, C., Hoppe, J. A., & Ziemann, N. (2021). Faster, harder, greener? Empirical evidence on the role of the individual Pace of Life for productivity and pro-environmental behavior. Ecological Economics, 191, Article 107212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212
@article{Hoffmann_Hoppe_Ziemann_2021, title={Faster, harder, greener? Empirical evidence on the role of the individual Pace of Life for productivity and pro-environmental behavior}, volume={191}, DOI={10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212}, number={107212}, journal={Ecological Economics}, author={Hoffmann, Christin and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Ziemann, Niklas}, year={2021} }
Hoffmann, Christin, Julia Amelie Hoppe, and Niklas Ziemann. “Faster, Harder, Greener? Empirical Evidence on the Role of the Individual Pace of Life for Productivity and pro-Environmental Behavior.” Ecological Economics 191 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212.
C. Hoffmann, J. A. Hoppe, and N. Ziemann, “Faster, harder, greener? Empirical evidence on the role of the individual Pace of Life for productivity and pro-environmental behavior,” Ecological Economics, vol. 191, Art. no. 107212, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212.
Hoffmann, Christin, et al. “Faster, Harder, Greener? Empirical Evidence on the Role of the Individual Pace of Life for Productivity and pro-Environmental Behavior.” Ecological Economics, vol. 191, 107212, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212.
Google Scholar