On the diversity of fossil and alternative gasoline combustion chemistry: A comparative flow reactor study
J. Zinsmeister, N. Gaiser, J. Melder, T. Bierkandt, P. Hemberger, T. Kasper, M. Aigner, M. Köhler, P. Oßwald, Combustion and Flame 243 (2022).
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Journal Article
| Published
| English
Author
Zinsmeister, Julia;
Gaiser, Nina;
Melder, Jens;
Bierkandt, Thomas;
Hemberger, Patrick;
Kasper, TinaLibreCat ;
Aigner, Manfred;
Köhler, Markus;
Oßwald, Patrick
Department
Abstract
Recent progress in molecular combustion chemistry allows for detailed investigation of the intermediate species pool even for complex chemical fuel compositions, as occur for technical fuels. This study pro-vides detailed investigation of a comprehensive set of complex alternative gasoline fuels obtained from laminar flow reactors equipped with molecular-beam sampling techniques for observation of the com-bustion intermediate species pool in homogeneous gas phase reactions. The combination of ionization techniques including double-imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence (i2PEPICO) spectroscopy enables deeper mechanistic insights into the underlying reaction network relevant to technical fuels. The se-lected fuels focus on contemporary automotive engine application as drop-in fuels compliant to European EN 228 specification for gasoline. Therefore, potential alternative gasoline blends containing oxygenated hydrocarbons as octane improvers obtainable from bio-technological production routes, e.g., ethanol, iso- butanol, methyl tert -butyl ether (MTBE), and ethyl tert -butyl ether (ETBE), as well as a Fischer-Tropsch surrogate were investigated. The fuel set is completed by two synthetic naphtha fractions obtained from Fischer-Tropsch and methanol-to-gasoline processes alongside with a fossil reference gasoline. In total, speciation data for 11 technical fuels from two atmospheric flow reactor setups are presented. Detailed main and intermediate species profiles are provided for slightly rich ( 4) = 1.2) and lean ( 4) = 0.8) con-ditions for intermediate to high temperatures. Complementary, the isomer distribution on different mass channels, like m/z = 78 u fulvene/benzene, of four gasolines was investigated. Experimental findings are analyzed in terms of the detailed fuel composition and literature findings for molecular combustion chemistry. Influences of oxygenated fuel components as well as composition of the hydrocarbon frac-tions are examined with a particular focus on the soot precursor chemistry. This dataset is available for validation of chemical kinetic mechanisms for realistic gasolines containing oxygenated hydrocarbons.(c) 2021 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Publishing Year
Journal Title
Combustion and Flame
Volume
243
Article Number
111961
ISSN
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Zinsmeister J, Gaiser N, Melder J, et al. On the diversity of fossil and alternative gasoline combustion chemistry: A comparative flow reactor study. Combustion and Flame. 2022;243. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111961
Zinsmeister, J., Gaiser, N., Melder, J., Bierkandt, T., Hemberger, P., Kasper, T., Aigner, M., Köhler, M., & Oßwald, P. (2022). On the diversity of fossil and alternative gasoline combustion chemistry: A comparative flow reactor study. Combustion and Flame, 243, Article 111961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111961
@article{Zinsmeister_Gaiser_Melder_Bierkandt_Hemberger_Kasper_Aigner_Köhler_Oßwald_2022, title={On the diversity of fossil and alternative gasoline combustion chemistry: A comparative flow reactor study}, volume={243}, DOI={10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111961}, number={111961}, journal={Combustion and Flame}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Zinsmeister, Julia and Gaiser, Nina and Melder, Jens and Bierkandt, Thomas and Hemberger, Patrick and Kasper, Tina and Aigner, Manfred and Köhler, Markus and Oßwald, Patrick}, year={2022} }
Zinsmeister, Julia, Nina Gaiser, Jens Melder, Thomas Bierkandt, Patrick Hemberger, Tina Kasper, Manfred Aigner, Markus Köhler, and Patrick Oßwald. “On the Diversity of Fossil and Alternative Gasoline Combustion Chemistry: A Comparative Flow Reactor Study.” Combustion and Flame 243 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111961.
J. Zinsmeister et al., “On the diversity of fossil and alternative gasoline combustion chemistry: A comparative flow reactor study,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 243, Art. no. 111961, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111961.
Zinsmeister, Julia, et al. “On the Diversity of Fossil and Alternative Gasoline Combustion Chemistry: A Comparative Flow Reactor Study.” Combustion and Flame, vol. 243, 111961, Elsevier BV, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111961.