Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments

K.I. Karpenko, R.E. Hagengruber, C.R. Nielsen, Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research (2024) 84–99.

Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Journal Article | Published | English
Author
Karpenko, Kateryna I.; Hagengruber, Ruth EdithLibreCat ; Nielsen, Cynthia R.
Abstract
The authors aim to disclose the anthropological dimension of ecocide during and after Russia’s war against Ukraine, relying on the multidisciplinary practices and intellectual production of ecofeminist women thinkers, including philosophers, sociologists, historians, psychologists, and others. The theoretical basis methodological approaches in philosophical anthropology, phenomenology, analytical philosophy, communicative philosophy, existentialism, ethics of justice, and ethics of care determine the study’s theoretical basis. Originality. For the first time, a systematic analysis of the anthropological dimension of ecocide has been carried out based on ecofeminist methodology. The specifics of the Ukrainian resistance to ecocide were revealed as part of a single struggle – an anti-imperial and ecological struggle for independence and prosperity. It is emphasized that during the war, the opposition to ecocide is a component of the fight for national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country, and therefore, the ideas of pacifism in this period are subordinated to this primary goal. After the war, preventing threats of ecocide should become an integral part of the struggle for stable peace and prosperity. Ecofeminist pacifist perspectives should be a priority among the most essential goals for that period. Conclusions. Ecofeminist methodological assessments offer valuable insights into the anthropological dimension of ecocide in wartime and post-war contexts, highlighting the complex interplay between gender, violence, and environmental destruction. By focusing on the experiences and perspectives of women and marginalized communities, ecofeminist analyses contribute to a more holistic understanding of ecocide and its impacts on both human populations and ecosystems.
Publishing Year
Journal Title
Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research
Issue
25
Page
84-99
LibreCat-ID

Cite this

Karpenko KI, Hagengruber RE, Nielsen CR. Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2024;(25):84-99. doi:10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307636
Karpenko, K. I., Hagengruber, R. E., & Nielsen, C. R. (2024). Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 25, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307636
@article{Karpenko_Hagengruber_Nielsen_2024, title={Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments}, DOI={10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307636}, number={25}, journal={Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research}, publisher={Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies}, author={Karpenko, Kateryna I. and Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Nielsen, Cynthia R.}, year={2024}, pages={84–99} }
Karpenko, Kateryna I., Ruth Edith Hagengruber, and Cynthia R. Nielsen. “Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments.” Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, no. 25 (2024): 84–99. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307636.
K. I. Karpenko, R. E. Hagengruber, and C. R. Nielsen, “Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments,” Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, no. 25, pp. 84–99, 2024, doi: 10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307636.
Karpenko, Kateryna I., et al. “Anthropological Dimension of Wartime Ecocide: Ecofeminist Methodological Assessments.” Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, no. 25, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, 2024, pp. 84–99, doi:10.15802/ampr.v0i25.307636.

Export

Marked Publications

Open Data LibreCat

Search this title in

Google Scholar