P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers
J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, R. Goldbrunner, C.W. Lucas, eds., P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers, 2017.
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Conference (Editor)
| Published
| English
Editor
Pieczewski, J;
Nettekoven, C;
Neuschmelting, V;
Thiele, K;
Goldbrunner, R;
Lucas, C.W
Publishing Year
forms.conference_editor.field.series_title_volume.label
Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume
128
Issue
3
Page
e126-e127
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, Thiele K, Goldbrunner R, Lucas CW, eds. P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers. Vol 128.; 2017:e126-e127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345
Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K., Goldbrunner, R., & Lucas, C. W. (Eds.). (2017). P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers (Vol. 128, Issue 3, pp. e126–e127). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345
@book{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_Goldbrunner_Lucas_2017, series={Clinical Neurophysiology}, title={P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers}, volume={128}, DOI={https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345 }, number={3}, year={2017}, pages={e126–e127}, collection={Clinical Neurophysiology} }
Pieczewski, J, C Nettekoven, V Neuschmelting, K Thiele, R Goldbrunner, and C.W Lucas, eds. P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers. Vol. 128. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345 .
J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, R. Goldbrunner, and C. W. Lucas, Eds., P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers, vol. 128, no. 3. 2017, pp. e126–e127.
Pieczewski, J., et al., editors. P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers. no. 3, 2017, pp. e126–27, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345 .
Google Scholar