Benchmarking semi-empirical quantum chemical methods on liquid water
X. Wu, H. Elgabarty, V. Alizadeh, A. Henao Aristizabal, F. Zysk, C. Plessl, S. Ehlert, J. Hutter, T.D. Kühne, (2025).
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Preprint
| English
Author
Wu, XinLibreCat;
Elgabarty, HossamLibreCat
;
Alizadeh, Vahideh;
Henao Aristizabal, AndresLibreCat;
Zysk, FrederikLibreCat;
Plessl, ChristianLibreCat
;
Ehlert, Sebastian;
Hutter, Jürg;
Kühne, Thomas D.LibreCat
Abstract
Stimulated by the renewed interest and recent developments in semi-empirical quantum chemical (SQC) methods for noncovalent interactions, we examine the properties of liquid water at ambient conditions by means of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, both with the conventional NDDO-type (neglect of diatomic differential overlap) methods, e.g. AM1 and PM6, and with DFTB-type (density-functional tight-binding) methods, e.g. DFTB2 and GFN-xTB. Besides the original parameter sets, some specifically reparametrized SQC methods (denoted as AM1-W, PM6-fm, and DFTB2-iBi) targeting various smaller water systems ranging from molecular clusters to bulk are considered as well. The quality of these different SQC methods for describing liquid water properties at ambient conditions are assessed by comparison to well-established experimental data and also to BLYP-D3 density functional theory-based ab initio MD simulations. Our analyses reveal that static and dynamics properties of bulk water are poorly described by all considered SQC methods with the original parameters, regardless of the underlying theoretical models, with most of the methods suffering from too weak hydrogen bonds and hence predicting a far too fluid water with highly distorted hydrogen bond kinetics. On the other hand, the reparametrized force-matchcd PM6-fm method is shown to be able to quantitatively reproduce the static and dynamic features of liquid water, and thus can be used as a computationally efficient alternative to electronic structure-based MD simulations for liquid water that requires extended length and time scales. DFTB2-iBi predicts a slightly overstructured water with reduced fluidity, whereas AM1-W gives an amorphous ice-like structure for water at ambient conditions.
Publishing Year
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Wu X, Elgabarty H, Alizadeh V, et al. Benchmarking semi-empirical quantum chemical methods on liquid water. Published online 2025.
Wu, X., Elgabarty, H., Alizadeh, V., Henao Aristizabal, A., Zysk, F., Plessl, C., Ehlert, S., Hutter, J., & Kühne, T. D. (2025). Benchmarking semi-empirical quantum chemical methods on liquid water.
@article{Wu_Elgabarty_Alizadeh_Henao Aristizabal_Zysk_Plessl_Ehlert_Hutter_Kühne_2025, title={Benchmarking semi-empirical quantum chemical methods on liquid water}, author={Wu, Xin and Elgabarty, Hossam and Alizadeh, Vahideh and Henao Aristizabal, Andres and Zysk, Frederik and Plessl, Christian and Ehlert, Sebastian and Hutter, Jürg and Kühne, Thomas D.}, year={2025} }
Wu, Xin, Hossam Elgabarty, Vahideh Alizadeh, Andres Henao Aristizabal, Frederik Zysk, Christian Plessl, Sebastian Ehlert, Jürg Hutter, and Thomas D. Kühne. “Benchmarking Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemical Methods on Liquid Water,” 2025.
X. Wu et al., “Benchmarking semi-empirical quantum chemical methods on liquid water.” 2025.
Wu, Xin, et al. Benchmarking Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemical Methods on Liquid Water. 2025.