P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers
J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, C. Weiss Lucas, in: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, pp. e126–e127.
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Conference Abstract
| English
Author
Pieczewski, J.;
Nettekoven, C.;
Neuschmelting, V.;
Thiele, K.;
Grefkes, C.;
Goldbrunner, R.;
Weiss Lucas, C.
Publishing Year
Proceedings Title
Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume
128
Issue
3
Page
e126-e127
ISSN
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, et al. P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. Vol 128. ; 2017:e126-e127. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345
Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K., Grefkes, C., Goldbrunner, R., & Weiss Lucas, C. (2017). P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(3), e126–e127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345
@inproceedings{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_Grefkes_Goldbrunner_Weiss Lucas_2017, title={P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers}, volume={128}, DOI={10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345}, number={3}, booktitle={Clinical Neurophysiology}, author={Pieczewski, J. and Nettekoven, C. and Neuschmelting, V. and Thiele, K. and Grefkes, C. and Goldbrunner, R. and Weiss Lucas, C.}, year={2017}, pages={e126–e127} }
Pieczewski, J., C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, and C. Weiss Lucas. “P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” In Clinical Neurophysiology, 128:e126–27, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345.
J. Pieczewski et al., “P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. e126–e127, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345.
Pieczewski, J., et al. “P228 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test–Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 128, no. 3, 2017, pp. e126–27, doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345.
Google Scholar