EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers
J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, C.W. Lucas, in: Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016, p. e266.
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Conference Abstract
| English
Author
Pieczewski, J.;
Nettekoven, C.;
Neuschmelting, V.;
Thiele, KristinaLibreCat 
;
Grefkes, C.;
Goldbrunner, R.;
Lucas, C. Weiss
;
Grefkes, C.;
Goldbrunner, R.;
Lucas, C. WeissPublishing Year
Proceedings Title
Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume
127
Issue
9
Page
e266
ISSN
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, et al. EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. In: Clinical Neurophysiology. Vol 127. ; 2016:e266. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117
Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K., Grefkes, C., Goldbrunner, R., & Lucas, C. W. (2016). EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers. Clinical Neurophysiology, 127(9), e266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117
@inproceedings{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_Grefkes_Goldbrunner_Lucas_2016, title={EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers}, volume={127}, DOI={10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117}, number={9}, booktitle={Clinical Neurophysiology}, author={Pieczewski, J. and Nettekoven, C. and Neuschmelting, V. and Thiele, Kristina and Grefkes, C. and Goldbrunner, R. and Lucas, C. Weiss}, year={2016}, pages={e266} }
Pieczewski, J., C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, Kristina Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, and C. Weiss Lucas. “EP 66. Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” In Clinical Neurophysiology, 127:e266, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117.
J. Pieczewski et al., “EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016, vol. 127, no. 9, p. e266, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117.
Pieczewski, J., et al. “EP 66. Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers.” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 127, no. 9, 2016, p. e266, doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117.
Google Scholar