Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness
P. Weber, K. Binder, S. Krauss, Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018).
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Journal Article
| Published
| English
Author
Weber, Patrick;
Binder, KarinLibreCat;
Krauss, Stefan
Publishing Year
Journal Title
Frontiers in Psychology
Volume
9
ISSN
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Weber P, Binder K, Krauss S. Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01833
Weber, P., Binder, K., & Krauss, S. (2018). Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01833
@article{Weber_Binder_Krauss_2018, title={Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness}, volume={9}, DOI={10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01833}, journal={Frontiers in Psychology}, publisher={Frontiers Media SA}, author={Weber, Patrick and Binder, Karin and Krauss, Stefan}, year={2018} }
Weber, Patrick, Karin Binder, and Stefan Krauss. “Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01833.
P. Weber, K. Binder, and S. Krauss, “Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01833.
Weber, Patrick, et al. “Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, Frontiers Media SA, 2018, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01833.
Google Scholar