EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers
J. Pieczewski, C. Nettekoven, V. Neuschmelting, K. Thiele, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, C.W. Lucas, eds., EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers, 2016.
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Conference (Editor)
| Published
| English
Editor
Pieczewski, J;
Nettekoven, C;
Neuschmelting, V;
Thiele, K;
Grefkes, C;
Goldbrunner, R;
Lucas, C.W
Publishing Year
forms.conference_editor.field.series_title_volume.label
Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume
127
Issue
9
Page
e266
LibreCat-ID
Cite this
Pieczewski J, Nettekoven C, Neuschmelting V, et al., eds. EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers. Vol 127.; 2016:e266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117
Pieczewski, J., Nettekoven, C., Neuschmelting, V., Thiele, K., Grefkes, C., Goldbrunner, R., & Lucas, C. W. (Eds.). (2016). EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers (Vol. 127, Issue 9, p. e266). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117
@book{Pieczewski_Nettekoven_Neuschmelting_Thiele_ Grefkes_Goldbrunner_Lucas_2016, series={ Clinical Neurophysiology}, title={EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers}, volume={127}, DOI={https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 }, number={9}, year={2016}, pages={e266}, collection={ Clinical Neurophysiology} }
Pieczewski, J, C Nettekoven, V Neuschmelting, K Thiele, C Grefkes, R Goldbrunner, and C.W Lucas, eds. EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers. Vol. 127. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 .
J. Pieczewski et al., Eds., EP 66 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers, vol. 127, no. 9. 2016, p. e266.
Pieczewski, J., et al., editors. EP 66 Better Tolerability and Lower Mean Intensities Favour Higher-Frequent Stimulation as Compared to 10 Hz Online-RTMS for Language Mapping: A Test-Retest Reliability Study in Healthy Volunteers. no. 9, 2016, p. e266, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117 .
Google Scholar