Please note that LibreCat no longer supports Internet Explorer versions 8 or 9 (or earlier).
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox.
10 Publications
2021 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57975
C. Nettekoven et al., “P 30. Evoking language errors using online paired-pulse TMS – A proof-of-principle study,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021, vol. 132, no. 8, p. e15, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.02.351.
LibreCat
| DOI
2020 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57976
C. Nettekoven, K. Jonas, J. Pieczewski, D. Klütsch, R. Goldbrunner, and C. W. Lucas, “P91 Paired-pulse TMS and higher-frequent rTMS for mapping of cortical language areas,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. e221–e222, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.12.089.
LibreCat
| DOI
2019 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 58027
C. W. Lucas et al., “FV 41 Short-train transcranial magnetic stimulation for time-locked mapping of cortical language processing,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. e139–e140, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.646.
LibreCat
| DOI
2018 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57977
C. Nettekoven, K. Jonas, T. Lichtenstein, C. Grefkes, R. Goldbrunner, and C. W. Lucas, “PB7. Comparison of three different fMRI paradigms for language mapping,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018, vol. 129, no. 8, p. e57, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.632.
LibreCat
| DOI
2017 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57973
C. Nettekoven et al., “P 13 Congruency between speech-related areas investigated by fMRI and three rTMS protocols with different frequencies,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. e332–e333, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.092.
LibreCat
| DOI
2017 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57968
J. Pieczewski et al., “P228 Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test–retest reliability study in healthy volunteers,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. e126–e127, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.345.
LibreCat
| DOI
2017 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 58004
C. W. Lucas et al., “P 14 Motor component of speech errors in rTMS language mapping,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, vol. 128, no. 10, p. e333, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.093.
LibreCat
| DOI
2017 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57967
J. Pieczewski et al., “P 12 Integrating nTMS motor mapping of the M1 tongue area into diffusion tractography to reconstruct motor-speech pathways,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017, vol. 128, no. 10, p. e332, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.091.
LibreCat
| DOI
2016 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57970
J. Pieczewski et al., “EP 66. Better tolerability and lower mean intensities favour higher-frequent stimulation as compared to 10 Hz online-rTMS for language mapping: A test-retest reliability study in healthy volunteers,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016, vol. 127, no. 9, p. e266, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.117.
LibreCat
| DOI
2015 | Conference Abstract | LibreCat-ID: 57966
J. Pieczewski et al., “P156. Good long-term error rate retest reliability of 10Hz neuronavigated repetitive TMS speech/language mapping in healthy volunteers,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015, vol. 126, no. 8, p. e137, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.224.
LibreCat
| DOI