A comparison of two predictive approaches to control the longitudinal dynamics of electric vehicles

J. Eckstein, S. Peitz, K. Schäfer, P. Friedel, U. Köhler, M. Hessel von Molo, S. Ober-Blöbaum, M. Dellnitz, in: Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering, 2016, pp. 465–472.

Download
No fulltext has been uploaded.
Conference Paper | Published | English
Author
Eckstein, Julian; Peitz, SebastianLibreCat ; Schäfer, Kai; Friedel, Patrick; Köhler, Ulrich; Hessel von Molo, Mirko ; Ober-Blöbaum, SinaLibreCat; Dellnitz, Michael
Abstract
In this contribution we compare two different approaches to the implementation of a Model Predictive Controller in an electric vehicle with respect to the quality of the solution and real-time applicability. The goal is to develop an intelligent cruise control in order to extend the vehicle range, i.e. to minimize energy consumption, by computing the optimal torque profile for a given track. On the one hand, a path-based linear model with strong simplifications regarding the vehicle dynamics is used. On the other hand, a nonlinear model is employed in which the dynamics of the mechanical and electrical subsystem are modeled.
Publishing Year
Proceedings Title
Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering
Volume
26
Page
465-472
ISSN
LibreCat-ID

Cite this

Eckstein J, Peitz S, Schäfer K, et al. A comparison of two predictive approaches to control the longitudinal dynamics of electric vehicles. In: Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering. Vol 26. ; 2016:465-472. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.059
Eckstein, J., Peitz, S., Schäfer, K., Friedel, P., Köhler, U., Hessel von Molo, M., Ober-Blöbaum, S., & Dellnitz, M. (2016). A comparison of two predictive approaches to control the longitudinal dynamics of electric vehicles. Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering, 26, 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.059
@inproceedings{Eckstein_Peitz_Schäfer_Friedel_Köhler_Hessel von Molo_Ober-Blöbaum_Dellnitz_2016, title={A comparison of two predictive approaches to control the longitudinal dynamics of electric vehicles}, volume={26}, DOI={10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.059}, booktitle={Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering}, author={Eckstein, Julian and Peitz, Sebastian and Schäfer, Kai and Friedel, Patrick and Köhler, Ulrich and Hessel von Molo, Mirko and Ober-Blöbaum, Sina and Dellnitz, Michael}, year={2016}, pages={465–472} }
Eckstein, Julian, Sebastian Peitz, Kai Schäfer, Patrick Friedel, Ulrich Köhler, Mirko Hessel von Molo, Sina Ober-Blöbaum, and Michael Dellnitz. “A Comparison of Two Predictive Approaches to Control the Longitudinal Dynamics of Electric Vehicles.” In Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering, 26:465–72, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.059.
J. Eckstein et al., “A comparison of two predictive approaches to control the longitudinal dynamics of electric vehicles,” in Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering, 2016, vol. 26, pp. 465–472, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.059.
Eckstein, Julian, et al. “A Comparison of Two Predictive Approaches to Control the Longitudinal Dynamics of Electric Vehicles.” Procedia Technology, 3rd International Conference on System-Integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering, vol. 26, 2016, pp. 465–72, doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.059.

Export

Marked Publications

Open Data LibreCat

Search this title in

Google Scholar